Author’s note: This is a special supplement of a multi-part interview
with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took
place in Benghazi. It is important to note that the information
contained in this series was developed from interviews that spanned over
100 hours. My source requested that the following information be
written separately due to its importance. DH: You told me that you wanted to talk about the lies behind
Benghazi, said it is critical for everyone to understand the reason for
the lies. and asked that we do this separately. Go ahead.
It’s about the lie, and once you understand it, it becomes extremely
revealing. It’s about what the public has been told from the very
beginning. Do you realize that a lot of people, especially Obama’s
associates and supporters do not believe that they’ve been lied to? Do
you understand that much of the public does not believe that they were
lied to? Like a lot of us, you’re in this thing so deep that we forget
not everyone even believes they’ve been lied to. They’re certainly not
going to hear about it in the media. To understand how deep this goes,
how important it is, and why it is so important, we’ve got to go back to
the very beginning.
Think back to when we were first told that Ambassador Stevens, Sean
Smith, Glen Dougherty, Tyrone Woods were killed in Benghazi. The media
reported that Stevens and the others were killed in an attack on the
American consulate in Benghazi. Every major media outlet identified the location of the attack as an American consulate, much like this Reuters report and this from The Washington Times. But there was no U.S. consulate in Benghazi, so where did this information originate?
DH: Didn’t the administration call it a consulate?
II: Exactly. Our embassies and consulate offices are directly under
the control of the U.S. State Department. They are areas of sovereign
territory. Consulate offices are like satellite offices to each embassy,
and they are located in convenient geographic locations
in other countries to assist people with routine or minor matters,
saving them a trip to the actual embassy. Consulates are easily
identifiable and all have U.S. flags flying prominently for easy
identification. A listing of U.S. embassies and consulate offices in
other countries can be found on the State Department web site. Just
about everyone working at State knows the locations of the embassies and consulates, as do most of our leaders in the executive branch.
So from the outset, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama certainly knew,
without any doubt, that there was no consulate or diplomatic mission in
Benghazi. None. In fact, on August 27, 2012, just 15 days before the
attack in Benghazi, Ambassador Chris Stevens ceremoniously opened the
U.S. Embassy in Tripoli with the U.S. State Department issuing press
releases and official statements. Tripoli was the only diplomatic mission in Libya - period. And it was just established.
So one of the very first lies was to deliberate misidentify or
improperly characterize the compound in Benghazi as a consulate. Was
there an American flag flying outside of this compound? No. Was any
diplomatic legitimate business being conducted at this compound? No. But
they called it a consulate to draw attention away from the fact this
was a CIA base of operations.
It was located in a relatively rural area, and it consisted of a residence and a separate “annex” located about 1800 feet away. By car,
the annex was just over a mile away. It was difficult to find, too.
People coming from Tripoli to this compound often got turned around,
even with the help of a GPS.
So the very first thing everyone must understand is that the
administration, including Barack Obama and others in the executive
branch, and the State Department, including Hillary Clinton (her official statement
identified the compound as a mission, suggesting a ‘diplomatic
mission’) knew that this compound served no legitimate diplomatic
purpose. That’s the first lie. DH: We now know that it was a CIA compound located in a somewhat rural area and not identifiable as U.S. owned or operated.
II: Correct. So think about this. The compound was unmarked,
operationally discreet, located in a rural area and difficult to find.
How did a few hundred protesters suddenly gather at this location on the
evening of 9/11? How did they know where to go, if this was not an
embassy or consulate? More to the point, how is it possible that anyone
in any official capacity in this administration could realistically
describe the attack in terms of a protest gone bad, even at the first
reports of trouble? They could not. This was a deliberate lie to the
So how is it that U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice, five days
after the attack and after much of the initial dust settled, appeared on
five national news shows and still attributed the murders of Americans
as a result of protests? Who told her to do that? And, she continued to
blame the murders on an obscure internet video. Why? DH: They have since publicly reclassified the description of the location.
II: They had to because they could not continue to call the CIA
operations center an embassy or consulate. But they have yet to offer
any reasonable explanation for what happened there. Barack Obama has yet
to look the family members of Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith, or Glen
Dougherty in the eyes and tell the truth. He has yet to tell Americans
the truth about the events of 9/11, and the reason for the lies,
which continue through today. No one has stepped up to tell the truth.
We have only seen denials reinforced by distractions. They continue to
lie to this day. Who are they lying to and what is the logical reason
for the lies?
They are only lying to the American people. All other governments
know what’s going on. And most importantly, the reason they are
continuing to lie is to cover up their plans as they are moving forward with their agenda. Everyone must understand how important this is. The
Obama plan continues. No one is stopping them or this agenda. And in
case you have any questions about what this agenda is, let me explain it
clearly and concisely. Obama, Clinton, their foreign policy advisors and the people involved in this agenda intend to start a warthat will make Afghanistan and Iraq look like a small police action by comparison.
They are going to start a war that will likely grow from a regional war
to a global war, or WW III. Afghanistan ‘imploded’ when attacked, as
did Iraq. Syria will not, it will explode. Do the American people understand this?
Until now, everyone has been focused on the ‘little lies.’ The security, the misidentification of the CIA compound, the timeline, and on and on. They want us to focus on the little lies so they can pull off the BIG LIE.
The big lie being told is that the U.S. is merely providing minimal
support, including humanitarian aid to the Syrians so they can defend
themselves from Assad. That’s the big lie that covers up what they are
really doing in the region.
The CIA compound in Benghazi was a logistics hub for weapons, but not
only weapons from Libya. Weapons ordered by and destined for other
countries, like Saudi Arabia, the UAE and other countries, knowing the
plan, were allowing the weapons to be diverted, with Libya acting as the
central shipping hub. When Assad falls and U.S. troops are called in
for ground support, who will they be fighting? The Syrian army? No, they
will be fighting the Iranian army, the Russian army and the Chinese
army. Why? Because Iran, Russia and China all have a stake in the
region. Putin called Syria his red line in the sand, and stated that WW
III will start in Syria, not Iran.
Benghazi is a moving target of little lies that serve as cover for the big lie. Are Americans onboard?