UN Gun Grab Follows State Department Plan
The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by
observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack
Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department
memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete
disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.
The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy
because it outlines a plan to target “all types of conventional weapons,
notably including small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell.
Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns
that the agreement “is trying to act as though this is really just a
treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there
is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”
A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members
to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it
infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms”.
The letter adds that “…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT
is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign
policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.”
Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists,
insurgents and “international crime syndicates,” the UN is busy trying
to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a
global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a
global authority.
This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a “Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.”
Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document
spells out a plan to create a “United Nations Peace Force” that would
“enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.”
While the document initially focuses on scrapping
nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to
own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, “for the
purpose of maintaining internal order,” and the UN “peacekeeping” force
itself, which would require “agreed manpower.”
“The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except
for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace
Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments
would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes,” states the
document.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to
destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute
the UN as the planet’s supreme authority with a world army, the document
serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to
oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for
decades.
As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of
the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive
administrations have tried but failed to accomplish – taking a huge bite
out of the second amendment – is by no means far fetched.
After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international
agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty
and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S.
involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely
stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.
Following Barack Obama’s arrogant rebuff of
Congress in seeking approval to strike Libya, during which he
churlishly remarked, “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional
question,” Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta affirmed that the U.S. now requires “international permission” before deciding on its military policy.
Other Obama-endorsed UN power grabs like the Law of the
Sea Treaty (LOST) as well as Agenda 21 and sustainable development are
also serving to decimate national sovereignty and remain almost
completely under the radar.
You only need to look at the European Union, which now crafts around 50 per cent of the laws made in member states like Britain, to understand how unelected global institutions can and have dictated policy on a national level.
The UN Arms Trade Treaty presents an existential threat
to the guns rights of American citizens and should be rejected for what
it is – yet another attempt by the Obama administration, in the
aftermath of the Fast and Furious scandal, to abolish the second
amendment by stealth.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com.
He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular
fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Monday, July 16, 2012 at 10:48 am
No comments:
Post a Comment