Sunday, December 2, 2012

Obamanations and Clintons Marxist Communist Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta says, We Lost Track of Syrian WMDs.

Obamanations and Clintons Marxist Communist Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta says, We Lost Track of Syrian WMDs.

Obamanations and Clintons Marxist Communist Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta says, We Lost Track of Syrian WMDs.
sure ya did ya new world order traitor lol now they have the false flag they need doh

Panetta: We Lost Track of Syrian WMDs
by Ben Shapiro28 Sep 2012, 10:18 AM PDT79post a comment

Today, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced that the US no longer had knowledge of the whereabouts of some Syrian chemical weapons, and admitted that those weapons may have been funneled to rebels or Iranian proxies. “There has been intelligence that there have been some moves that have taken place,” said Panetta. “Where exactly that’s taken place, we don’t know.”

Panetta maintained that the most dangerous weapons were the ones still in possession of the Syrian government. But “with regards to the movement of some of this and whether or not they’ve been able to locate some of it, we just don’t know.”

The Obama administration’s policy on Syria has been muddled, to say the least. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton maintained that current Syrian dictator Bashar Assad was “a reformer” last year. This year, the Obama administration has called for Assad to step down. Meanwhile, they’ve been funneling non-monetary resources to Syrian rebels, even though nobody really knows the political stance of the rebels.

In all of this chaos, the most important element – weapons of mass destruction – has been lost in the shuffle, putting us and our allies at risk. Just another check mark in the Obama Doctrine ledger of incompetence.

Democrats: Investigate Benghazi Attack After the Election

Take Panetta's words with a kIlo of salt,
first you must know who & what he is and was

CIA HEAD Linked to Marxist Institute, Now Funded by
George Soros06.15.11Obama Picks Commie to Run U.S. DefenseCIA Head Paid Tribute
MARXIST ORGANIZATION06.19.11Commie Panetta’s War on Reagan’s Defense
Policies06.19.11Leon Panetta’s Communist Friend and the Chinese Spy06.20.11CIA

Panetta Report 3: Leon Panetta and the Santa
Cruz Socialists
Submitted by Trevor on June 18, 2011 – 3:37 am EST12 Comments
Panetta Report 2 here.
It is now fairly well known that President Barack Obama enjoyed a close
relationship with the socialists, Trotskyites and “former” communists, who made
up the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America.It is less well known that
while a California Congressman, Obama’s Secretary of Defense nominee Leon
Panetta also worked closely with Santa Cruz based members of the US’s largest
Marxist organization. Hugh DeLacyA key point of contact was Hugh DeLacy,
Panetta’s friend and correspondent from at least 1976, until his death in 1986.
DeLacy was a long time Communist Party USA member who worked closely with
members of the California Communist Party splinter group, who then went on to
form the pro-Chinese New American Movement, which in turn joined with the
Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee in 1982 to form Democratic Socialists
of America.Santa Cruz New American Movement, and later Democratic Socialists of
America, effectively took over the Santa Cruz City Council after NAMers Mike
Rotkin and Bruce Van Allen joined with DSOCers Mardi Wormhoudt and John Laird
to form a majority on the Council in 1981.Another local DSAer, former
Trotskyite Gordon Haskell, served on the Santa Cruz Democratic Party Central
Committee for many years, while several other comrades held senior posts in the
local party.On September 6, 1986, Leon Panetta addressed a memorial service for
Hugh DeLacy at the Louden Nelson Center in Santa Cruz.
Obama impeachment bill now in Congress

Declares president's use of military without approval 'high crime, misdemeanor'
Published: 18 hours ago

Let the president be duly warned.

Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya. < WAGE THE DOG lol i meant wag the dog.. like Clinton use to do when he was in scandals like Obama. doh

The full wording of H. Con. Res. 107, which is currently referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, is as follows:

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under Article I, Section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.
Fordo sabotage enabled Netanyahu to move Iran red line to spring 2013
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report September 29, 2012, 9:24 AM (GMT+02:00) Tags: Binyamin Netanyahu Iran nuclear Fordo enrichment site chemical weapons Al Qods Leon Panetta Syrian chemical weapons storeThe sabotage of the Fordo uranium enrichment facility’s power lines on Aug. 17 gave Israel Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu extra leeway to move his original red line for Iran from late September 2012 – now – to the spring or early summer of 2013. The disruption of the underground enrichment plant's power supply caused several of the advanced IR-1 and IR-4 centrifuges producing the 20-percent grade uranium to burst into flames. Work was temporarily halted and the accumulation of 240 kilos for Iran’s first nuclear bomb slowed down by at least six months, debkafile’s intelligence sources report.
Hence Netanyahu’s new red line timeline of “late spring, early summer” - before which preventive action is imperative - in his speech to the UN General Assembly Thursday, Sept. 27.
Our military sources report that the advantage gained is already proving short-lived. Iran has pounced back fast with two aggressive counter-moves on Israel’s doorstep:
1. Thousands of elite Al Qods Brigades officers and men are being airlifted into Lebanon and Syria and deployed opposite Israeli borders (as debkafile has reported);

2. Shortly before the Israeli Prime Minister rose to speak in New York, Syrian President Bashar Assad again removed chemical weapons out of storage. Some were almost certainly passed to the incoming Iranian units. The weapons’ movements were accounted for as a precaution for “greater security,” but in practice they will be ready for use against Israel when the order is handed down from Tehran.

Friday, Sept. 28, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta was specifically asked by a reporter if it was believed that “Iran’s Revolutionary Guards or Syrian rebels had been able to get possession of any of the chemical weapons” which the secretary had just disclosed were on the move. He left the door open, saying only that he had “no firm information to confirm this.” That sort of question never comes out of thin air.

It was also the second time in three weeks that the defense secretary mentioned the movements of Syrian chemical weapons out of storage. This time, he said, ‘‘There has been intelligence that there have been some moves that have taken place. Where exactly that’s taken place, we don’t know.” But he did not rule out the possibility that they were being made ready for use.

This non-denial tied in closely with the words heard that day from US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: “Iran has left no doubt that it will do whatever it takes to protect the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad, Tehran’s staunch ally,” she said.
Syrian chemical weapons movements out of storage, the presence of crack Iranian fighting units on Israel’s borders and Tehran’s determination to keep Assad in power “whatever it takes” hung in menacing silence over Netanyahu’s powerful cartoon presentation of the Iranian nuclear peril.
Already on Sept. 16, the Revolutionary Guards chief Gen. Ali Jafary announced publicly that al Qods Brigades personnel had landed not only in Syria but also Lebanon. The chemical weapons may therefore have already reached Hizballah or be on their way there unbeknownst to US intelligence.
Both Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak have repeatedly stated that the transfer of chemical weapons to Hizballah would necessitate Israeli military action.
The IDF’s large-scale military call-up and firing exercise on the Golan of Sept. 19 failed to deter the Iranian military buildup opposite Israeli northern borders in Syria and Lebanon. The Iranian airlift continues and US intelligence has not denied that some al Qods arrivals may now be armed with chemical weapons.
The Iranian threat to Israel is therefore far from static; it is gaining substance and menace, keeping two IDF divisions on call in northern Israel after the exercise was over.
Netanyahu’s red line for preventing Iran achieving a 240-kilo enriched uranium stockpile does not cover an Iranian preemptive attack on the Jewish state before then – as threatened explicitly by the Iranian missiles Corps chief Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizade on Sept. 24.

Neither had Israeli officials anything to say about the Hamas leaders’ trips to Beirut and Tehran this month to sign military accords with the Revolutionary Guards and Hizballah pledging the Palestinian extremists’ participation in an attack on Israel.
The red line on the cartoon bomb which Netanyahu held up so effectively at the UN Thursday covered only one segment of the peril Tehran poses for the Jewish state. A more immediate danger lurks in the north.

No comments:

Post a Comment