Indefinite Military Detention Of US Citizens To Be Signed Into Law By Obama
We’ve
been trying to keep you aware of what has been taking place with the
talks concerning the 2103 version of the National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA). We’ve covered the Fenistein amendment,
which effectively did nothing, except to empower Congrees to authroize
the military at their whim to violate people’s 4th, 5th, and 6th
Amendment rights. But now the talks are all done and the legislation is
headed for Barack Obama’s desk to be signed into law soon, just as it
was nearly one year ago today, including provision to use the military
to indefinitely detain US citizens.
Previously, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) voted for the Feinstein
amendment to the NDAA. But then there came the hashing out of language
in the bill and Paul blasted Senator John McCain (R-AZ) for stripping away the amendment.
“We had protection in this bill. We passed an amendment that specifically said if you were an American citizen or here legally in the country, you would get a trial by jury,” Paul said. “It’s been removed because they want the ability to hold American citizens without trial in our country. This is so fundamentally wrong and goes against everything we stand for as a country that it can’t go unnoticed.”
The problem with Paul’s assertion is that there was no protection for anyone, whether they are a citizen of the US, a permanent resident or a visitor. Rights that are supposed to be protected under the Constitution be damned! Neither the NDAA, nor the amendment proposed protected one person who is on American Soil.
Paul called the NDAA an “abomination.” It is that, but so was the Feinstein amendment and even more so because it was deceptive at its core.
The Senate easily passed NDAA 2013 by a vote of 81-14. The next stop is Obama’s desk.
“We had protection in this bill. We passed an amendment that specifically said if you were an American citizen or here legally in the country, you would get a trial by jury,” Paul said. “It’s been removed because they want the ability to hold American citizens without trial in our country. This is so fundamentally wrong and goes against everything we stand for as a country that it can’t go unnoticed.”
The problem with Paul’s assertion is that there was no protection for anyone, whether they are a citizen of the US, a permanent resident or a visitor. Rights that are supposed to be protected under the Constitution be damned! Neither the NDAA, nor the amendment proposed protected one person who is on American Soil.
Paul called the NDAA an “abomination.” It is that, but so was the Feinstein amendment and even more so because it was deceptive at its core.
The Senate easily passed NDAA 2013 by a vote of 81-14. The next stop is Obama’s desk.
Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/12/indefinite-military-detention-of-us-citizens-to-be-signed-into-law-by-obama/#ixzz2GDBPo6M1
No comments:
Post a Comment