If Anonymous has definitive proof that Rove tried to hack the vote, present it.

This isn't a movie. Rove isn't Lex Luthor. This is real life, and Rove needs to be investigated if he tried to tamper with the 2012 election.

Anonymous needs to provide the evidence so that a real life investigation can be launched.

The jumping for joy and elation about what at present can be dimissed as a conspiracy theory is elevating Rove to untouchable.

It needs to end.

One of the problems with the 2004 election theft was trying to convince people that Republicans were as despicable as we now know they are. With the media complicit in aiding the Swift Liars, it was too easy to write off the massive election tampering as whining. The 2000 Court selection was easier to understand, but 2004 was an all-out assault on the entire process of democracy.

Across the country there ws vote switching, tampering, long lines, intimidation at the polls, closings, blackouts, confusion reporting the results. A lot of people likely still don't know about these incidents, but the outrage and the commissions that looked into the vote were very real. There really isn't going to be anything like it again, and there has already been a relatively incident-free election (2008) since then.

Here is an excerpt from the 2004 commission.

The first presidential election after HAVA became law — on November 2, 2004 — brought to light as many problems as in 2000, if not more. HAVA, which will take years to be fully implemented, was not responsible for most of the complaints. Instead, voters were discouraged or prevented from voting by the failure of election offices to process voter registration applications or to mail absentee ballots in time, and by the poor service and long lines at polling stations in a number of states. There were also reports of improper requests for voter ID and of voter intimidation and suppression tactics. Concerns were raised about partisan purges of voter registration lists and about deliberate failures to deliver voter registration applications to election authorities. Moreover, computer malfunctions impugned election results for at least one race, and different procedures for counting provisional ballots within and between states led to legal challenges and political protests. Had the margin of victory for the presidential contest been narrower, the lengthy dispute that followed the 2000 election could have been repeated.

http://www1.american.edu/ia/cfer/report/report.html

Robert Kennedy Jr. also explored the 2004 election theft:

Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0601-34.htm

Unlike Mitt, Kerry ran a smart race focusing on an electoral path to victory. By so doing he came within one state (Ohio) of winning.

Bush got 286 to Kerry's 251. Flip Ohio and Kerry wins 271 to 266. That was a close race.

Republicans mounted an undercover and almost surreal assault on the 2004 election process. In 2012, they attempted to use their power brazenly and openly to suppress the vote.

Now, back to Anonymous: Where is the evidence? This is not a game.

	Author	Time	Post
If Anonymous has definitive proof that Rove tried to hack the vote, present it. (Original post)	ProSense	Nov 18	OP
Show us the proof, Anony	Berlum	Nov 18	#1
Yes, we do. n/t	ProSense	Nov 18	#2
At least someone who thinks like Data	Coyotl	Nov 18	#202
EXCELLENT!!!! Man, LOVED that show!	calimary	Nov 18	#251
Love this, thanks for making my day. n/t	AnnieK401	Nov 18	#99
The proof is out there.	reusrename	Nov 18	#136
+1	valerief	Nov 18	#184
Not this BS again.	Coyotl	Nov 18	#203
Do you actually think you're going to stop people from posting their opinions on this board?....	OldDem2012	Nov 18	#233
I'm going to give y'all one more chance to respond.	reusrename	Nov 18	#250
Maybe you could choose not to read these threads, instead of being, you know,	WinkyDink	Nov 18	#253
Welcome to DU, reusrename!	calimary	Nov 18	#291
Always!	reusrename	Nov 19	#322
Exactly. It's been proven every way ....statistically, technically, timing, cover-up....	loudsue	Nov 19	#327
+1.	Phx_Dem	Nov 19	#357
where's the beef?	heaven05	Nov 18	#219
"He's Occupying the WH at the moment"? What does that mean? nm	Cha	Nov 18	#264
small	heaven05	Nov 18	#284
Anonymous is a JOKE!!	SkyDaddy7	Nov 19	#332
A group like Anon coming forward with details? the group wouldnt survive that	pasto76	Nov 18	#3
Who said they have to come forward?	ProSense	Nov 18	#8
Really?	Sekhmets Daughter	Nov 18	#120
Send it to Mother Jones, Atlantic Monthly and about 1/2 a dozen other news outlets	TalkingDog	Nov 18	#162
The foreign press has written about electronically flipping the primary for Romney.	reusrename	Nov 18	#170
Do you have a link for that?	Son of Gob	Nov 18	#213
Unfortunately, the links have been scrubbed the last time I looked.	reusrename	Nov 18	#257
lol	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#315
I found a live link to the article at ukprogressive.	reusrename	Nov 19	#336
Yes, and that entire line of logic fails for the following reasons.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#349
It's suddenly become obvious that you don't have a grasp of the question being raised here.	reusrename	Nov 19	#361
That quoted bit is the claim being made by the fellow doing this statistical analysis.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#363
We are obviously not talking about the same thing.	reusrename	Nov 19	#364
You are not clicking to the idea that the '10%' is an illusion.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#366
yes, peer review is necessary - can't image it taking more than another month or two	reusrename	Nov 19	#368
Again, I will believe it when I see it verified.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 20	#371
Obama was not a candidate in the Republican primaries.	reusrename	Nov 20	#372
So let's see it independently verified. Peer reviewed.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 20	#373
And published in a scientific journal.	reusrename	Nov 20	#374
I found a live link.	reusrename	Nov 19	#337
I've been subscribing to Mother Jones & The Atlantic for years...	Sekhmets Daughter	Nov 18	#172
It's	heaven05	Nov 18	#223
See!	heaven05	Nov 18	#222
"I am completely ignorant when it comes to anything technical"	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#314
Can't answer my questions yourself	Sekhmets Daughter	Nov 19	#345
There is absolutely NOTHING more dangerous about sharing the code and logs	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#348
Thank you!	Sekhmets Daughter	Nov 19	#351
Could easily be some	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#352
I will definitely	Sekhmets Daughter	Nov 19	#355
I don't think so, not with so many people on both sides watching.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#360
Sincere thanks, once again.	Sekhmets Daughter	Nov 19	#362
Agreed.	HooptieWagon	Nov 18	#171
You are so right. Maybe they	rainy	Nov 18	#41
love them anyway. put fear into the one percent	roguevalley	Nov 18	#141
They can dump whatever evidence they have on Wikileaks	AgingAmerican	Nov 18	#148
All they'd have to do is anonymously send their proof to the FBI. n/t	pnwmom	Nov 18	#241
But who is Anon referring to in this video to give info to? Wish they would turn proof over.	glinda	Nov 18	#309
I think they would if they'd actually done this	pnwmom	Nov 19	#330
I have not passed judgement on this at the moment.	glinda	Nov 19	#359
Because Anonymous can rest assured that if such info were provided,	MannyGoldstein	Nov 18	#4
He's untouchable! n/t	ProSense	Nov 18	#9
Like war criminals, no?	MannyGoldstein	Nov 18	#27
Sure, he's untouchable. n/t	ProSense	Nov 18	#62
I agree Manny. There is no reason for Anon to expose themselves. I doubt that they have any	rhett o rick	Nov 18	#131
'No reason', apart from basic honesty, that is, and a desire not to be complicit	muriel_volestrangler	Nov 19	#353
His untouchability is determined by his masters.But they have a long history of protecting their own	rhett o rick	Nov 18	#127
On what fucking planet is Rove going to be prosecuted?	Fumesucker	Nov 18	#22
He may not be prosecuted but . . .	brush	Nov 18	#143
Kinda like how Mike Connell got his comeuppance when he died in that plane crash...	cascadiance	Nov 18	#240
Yeah	brush	Nov 18	#256
"Rove would be prosecuted"	marions ghost	Nov 18	#37
Indeed, I did. nt	MannyGoldstein	Nov 18	#39
Yep..Rove would be prosecuted just like	INdemo	Nov 18	#88
THey could at least try	treestar	Nov 18	#154
Or Oliy North. Given a fine of $100 and 2 hours community service. nm	rhett o rick	Nov 18	#165
Yep, once the Repukes broke the seal	Rex	Nov 18	#210
But they can be assured that they would be. I just love threads like this.	Egalitarian Thug	Nov 18	#186
You need to read and listen to Stephen Spoonamore to understand. They did not use the	Dustlawyer	Nov 18	#5
That is also just a bunch of BS, just like the current deal, piled higher and deeper	Coyotl	Nov 18	#72
certainly no facts this time around	Celebration	Nov 18	#94
It is a n incontrovertable fact that the primary was electronically flipped.	reusrename	Nov 18	#177
Because you believe it, right?	Coyotl	Nov 18	#196
Of course not.	reusrename	Nov 18	#246
Look, Karl, you lost this time. Call it "Kerry's Revenge."	WinkyDink	Nov 18	#254
What part of Anonymous ... do you not understand?	GeorgeGist	Nov 18	#6
What part of conspiracy theory don't you understand?	ProSense	Nov 18	#10
I understand	sulphurdunn	Nov 18	#29
Perhaps unprovable is the point.	sofa king	Nov 18	#227
They can supply the proof to the FBI or any other government official	pnwmom	Nov 18	#245
I'm sure Anonymous isn't out to impress you	Eyes of the World	Nov 18	#7
"There is 'evidence' in the behavior of Rove on election night."	ProSense	Nov 18	#12
Gawd . . . if only that were possible. eom	BlueCaliDem	Nov 18	#53
Evidence in this case is simple, and necessary: the code	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#15
I predict we will never see the code	RomneyLies	Nov 18	#42
That's my suspicion, too	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#56
Precisely	RomneyLies	Nov 18	#104
The "anonymous" claims were a joke in my opinion.	JDPriestly	Nov 18	#121
Sorry to pop your bubble, but it is science.	reusrename	Nov 18	#262
So evidence equals speculation?	Riftaxe	Nov 18	#268
Well, I don't know what speculation you are referring to.	reusrename	Nov 19	#323
Are you talking about the 2 -count 'em, 2- malfunctioning machines in PA?	randome	Nov 19	#333
No. That's not the story.	reusrename	Nov 19	#335
The gigantic hole in your evidence	jeff47	Nov 19	#369
That would be a clever response if you had a clue.	reusrename	Nov 20	#370
Your first sentence states something that isn't known.	jeff47	Nov 20	#375
I do understand you much better now. You are definitely on the right track.	reusrename	Nov 20	#377
The reason you "round up the others" is you have no other reliable measurement.	jeff47	Nov 20	#378
Some clarifications.	reusrename	Nov 20	#379
Calculation requires actual data.	jeff47	Nov 20	#380
Yeah, he probably is a dumbshit.	reusrename	Nov 20	#381
No, he may very well be right. But he needs to use data to show he is right. (nt)	jeff47	Nov 20	#382
Fair enough.	reusrename	Nov 20	#383
what	heaven05	Nov 18	#287
Two machines in PA. Out of thousands nationwide.	randome	Nov 18	#288
okey dokey	heaven05	Nov 18	#294
That could be.	reusrename	Nov 19	#326
I don't honestly know if that was a key element..	reusrename	Nov 19	#324
Statistical abnormalities are real, but they are indirect evidence	D23MIURG23	Nov 18	#310
Well, I agree with your claim, but this isn't really a statistical abnormality, it's an algorithm.	reusrename	Nov 19	#325
Wouldn't there be some evidence	marions ghost	Nov 18	#64
It's remarkable that one of the most exacting scientific practices there is (programming)	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#70
Could you give me a binary answer please?	marions ghost	Nov 18	#85
Exactly	treestar	Nov 18	#158
Yes, it would all be right there on the log files, plain as day.	Coyotl	Nov 18	#81
And Vanity Fair?	marions ghost	Nov 18	#87
You're closer to getting this than most. Computer science forensics could find the	AikidoSoul	Nov 18	#150
"There is evidence" -- Where is this "evidence"?	NYC Liberal	Nov 18	#65
And then Anonymous gets no credit	treestar	Nov 18	#155
Of course they are.	pnwmom	Nov 18	#242
Where's the code? Where's the code? Where's the code? Where's the code?	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#11
Shouldn't be up to Anonymous to prove it	marions ghost	Nov 18	#75
Nor is it up to zealots to prove their god exists because they already know he does	Coyotl	Nov 18	#86
God?	marions ghost	Nov 18	#92
Your little laughing guy doesn't mask your disturbed anger.	WinkyDink	Nov 18	#255
Of course it should -- if they're not just making up a good story	pnwmom	Nov 18	#243
"Credit for Romney's loss"	marions ghost	Nov 18	#267
Precisely. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#317
I'm fairly certain...	99Forever	Nov 18	#13
Strange	ProSense	Nov 18	#14
Really?	99Forever	Nov 18	#21
"Then why do you feel compelled to respond?"	ProSense	Nov 18	#24
It's not ProSense who "demands" it. It's basic modern scientific claim-making	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#19
Anonymous doesn't...	99Forever	Nov 18	#26
"Get over it. Neither of you are that important."	ProSense	Nov 18	#36
I'm not the one making demands of someone I don't even know.	99Forever	Nov 18	#48
"Get over it"	ProSense	Nov 18	#55
Have fun tilting at windmills.	99Forever	Nov 18	#66
Demand: "Get over it"	ProSense	Nov 18	#69
When you are leaning over to believe something, it looks like others are tilting	Coyotl	Nov 18	#91
Whatever you say, buddy.	99Forever	Nov 18	#96
But you are willing to trust these people you don't know to have done something	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#319
Is that what I said?	99Forever	Nov 19	#342
Has nothing to do with me	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#44
Release the Code... Hell yeah!	RobertEarl	Nov 18	#214
All the more reason for Anonymous to release it if they know it	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#220
Why don't your officials release it?	RobertEarl	Nov 18	#225
Why are they suddenly "my" officials	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#226
Obviously you do not	RobertEarl	Nov 18	#229
Wait, are you Anonymous?	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#230
So, you agree the code is not transparent	RobertEarl	Nov 18	#234
Of course the code is secret	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#236
"Without code as evidence, of course not."	RobertEarl	Nov 18	#239
Sorry Robert, the fact that elections in our country have problems	D23MIURG23	Nov 19	#312
It would not be easy for anon to prove	thesquanderer	Nov 18	#247
Release the code and describe its function	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#260
Do you have any idea what it takes to develop software for embedded systems?	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#320
They're super-heroes. They can do anything.	randome	Nov 19	#334
I took no position on that	thesquanderer	Nov 19	#339
If they released code that can be proven to still be ON the machines	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#346
Exactly. Trying to rudely "kill" the messenger. didn't work. nm	Cha	Nov 18	#271
well	heaven05	Nov 18	#292
Shame on you!!	pocoloco	Nov 18	#146
Are you more important than we are?	treestar	Nov 18	#160
That's because Anonymous is mostly just a PR campaign.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#318
Sorry dood.	99Forever	Nov 19	#343
Uh huh. That's why when I patch code, I can show the before/after edits and explain why.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#347
Wow dooooood...	99Forever	Nov 19	#350
And you have a list of "disinterested third parties"	Stevepol	Nov 18	#32
Any good programmer could replicate and verify	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#35
Science is one thing, reality is another.	Stevepol	Nov 18	#216
does anonymous make you upset?	argiel1234	Nov 18	#278
No, Anonymous does not upset me at all	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#279
anon does not answer to you...that is the beauty	argiel1234	Nov 18	#280
Whether Anonymous answers to me is beside the point	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#281
anon scares your worldview	argiel1234	Nov 18	#283
Sure. Every time a CT gains traction on DU, the people asking questions are said to be 'scared'.	randome	Nov 18	#290
anon will come at it again..	argiel1234	Nov 18	#293
That's the proof? That we won an election?	randome	Nov 18	#295
We won because anonymous didnt allow electronic voting fraud	argiel1234	Nov 18	#296
You have no evidence of that. Neither does Anonymous.	randome	Nov 18	#297
exactly	heaven05	Nov 18	#34
I'm 100% certain	RomneyLies	Nov 18	#45
Worst than a fairy tale, it is disinformation supporting disinformation, intended to deceive voters	Coyotl	Nov 18	#95
It reminds me of faith in the supernatural. Proof is irrelevant, the Savior is coming.	freshwest	Nov 18	#139
I've been putting the cultists on ignore	RomneyLies	Nov 18	#142
Might as well. Going in circles, like arguing with repukes. Just believe, it'll all gonna happen!	freshwest	Nov 18	#192
Precisely. Parsimony and skepticism are practically a lost art.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#321
And most people don't give a flying fuck about Anonymous' claims	treestar	Nov 18	#159
any evidence Anonymous may have was illegally acquired	Evasporque	Nov 18	#16
Great, one conspiracy theory and two crooks?	ProSense	Nov 18	#20
You're thinking of law enforcement agencies.	JimDandy	Nov 18	#169
How the information is obtained doesn't matter to the media,	HooptieWagon	Nov 18	#180
Anonymous is not a part of the government, so the evidence would be admissible. The problem	Egalitarian Thug	Nov 18	#187
ORCA is a smokescreen; wrong place to look.	Atman	Nov 18	#17
Then the evidence	ProSense	Nov 18	#28
Why would it be "easy" to find?	Atman	Nov 18	#61
"why would they be looking at Husted software patches?"	ProSense	Nov 18	#74
yes or no?	heaven05	Nov 18	#18
I love the idea of a deterrent	ProSense	Nov 18	#31
Ya...that's sure to happen.	CanSocDem	Nov 18	#189
Yeah! Who needs pesky facts or evidence?	NYC Liberal	Nov 18	#58
Ego	heaven05	Nov 18	#103
Apparently facts are a terrible thing to waste on you as well	NYC Liberal	Nov 18	#113
your	heaven05	Nov 18	#117
Any thinking person would want facts.	NYC Liberal	Nov 18	#151
and	heaven05	Nov 18	#191
Well, keep spreading the meme that Democrats can't win	NYC Liberal	Nov 18	#212
Oh please.	heaven05	Nov 18	#218
If Rove created this whole false flag, how is Rove deterred by it?	Coyotl	Nov 18	#97
Anonymous will provide proof in 24 business hours.	msanthrope	Nov 18	#23
NO HE'S NOT!!!!	heaven05	Nov 18	#38
She. And my ego has nothing to do with this--either Anonymous	msanthrope	Nov 18	#52
Hey, Orly Taitz is much more believeable than this cup of tea	Coyotl	Nov 18	#102
I	heaven05	Nov 18	#107
ROFL	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#46
Can the hymns be far behind? A favorite:	msanthrope	Nov 18	#57
There was no vote hacking in 2004	RomneyLies	Nov 18	#25
There was a commission that found several irregularies, including	ProSense	Nov 18	#47
Now that is funny	marions ghost	Nov 18	#101
Funny how easy it was to hack punch cards in 2004	Coyotl	Nov 18	#105
I agree they should release all proof of vote hacking.	boston bean	Nov 18	#30
This just in: ProSense stands up for poor put upon Karl Rove who has been accused of evildoing	Fumesucker	Nov 18	#33
This just in: Prove Rove is a criminal not a myth or a legend	ProSense	Nov 18	#40
Bravo	RomneyLies	Nov 18	#49
Rove has far too much dirt on our political system to ever go to court	Fumesucker	Nov 18	#63
He's an evil genius, untouchable	ProSense	Nov 18	#71
Rove is the Devil; Anonymous is God...It's time to leave the faith-reasoning to the theologians	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#73
You think TPTB are going to let Rove sing in the courtroom?	Fumesucker	Nov 18	#84
+1000	heaven05	Nov 18	#43
Rove is laughing too.	ProSense	Nov 18	#50
So is Bush and co.	aandegoons	Nov 18	#108
Rove just lost $300 million dollars, and his funders are not happy	ProSense	Nov 18	#111
Oh I would love to see it.	aandegoons	Nov 18	#119
Right On	bahrbearian	Nov 18	#78
Too many fumes maybe?	Coyotl	Nov 18	#109
I'm not falling for anything	Fumesucker	Nov 18	#115
You Madam seem to be defending Rove	bahrbearian	Nov 18	#147
I am defending Rove. I think he failed all by himself w/o any help from a bullshit story!	Coyotl	Nov 18	#188
Even Rove cannot be convicted without evidence	treestar	Nov 18	#164
no shit. blind and unquestioning partisonship no matter which party makes for strange bedfellows!"	boilerbabe	Nov 18	#178
as their slogan says - "we are anonymous, we are legion"	quinnox	Nov 18	#51
I helped investigate 2004.	IdaBriggs	Nov 18	#54
Exactly	bahrbearian	Nov 18	#76
Yes, exactly:	ProSense	Nov 18	#89
Just like the banks were held accountable for this depression?	MannyGoldstein	Nov 18	#125
"Just like the banks were held accountable for this depression?"	ProSense	Nov 18	#129
Sounds like your defending Rove from slander , thats Too funny.	bahrbearian	Nov 18	#145
Not to me, it doesn't.. It sounds like she's asking for accountability and for that	Cha	Nov 18	#275
I helped investigate 2004.	Coyotl	Nov 18	#116
So "the people in charge" were interested. Then what?	rhett o rick	Nov 18	#238
Blah Blah Blah	Fence rider	Nov 18	#59
You are correct. They need to put up or shut up. If they cannot or will not provide proof,	patricia92243	Nov 18	#60
If Velvet Revolution didn't have a DONATE button, would this "Election Fraud" even exist?	Coyotl	Nov 18	#67
If...	KharmaTrain	Nov 18	#68
+1, I agree 100%.	tammywammy	Nov 18	#83
I'm inclined to see this as a horse's head in the bed	starroute	Nov 18	#77
Wouldn't this be better peddled on Free Republic? nt	NorthCarolina	Nov 18	#79
Yeah, they're all into evidence. n/t	ProSense	Nov 18	#82
How to Rig An American Election - A 10 Page Historical Analysis, Harpers	Melinda	Nov 18	#80
How would you explain the massive push ongoing by some here	NorthCarolina	Nov 18	#100
Easy to explain	Coyotl	Nov 18	#122
Whenever there's a massive push	marions ghost	Nov 18	#273
There has been a massive push to discredit creationism,	D23MIURG23	Nov 19	#316
A "lack of interest" in a topic	NorthCarolina	Nov 19	#340
Two points.	D23MIURG23	Nov 20	#384
Not really	marions ghost	Nov 19	#341
I suppose it depends on where you are looking.	D23MIURG23	Nov 20	#385
Because the truth is important to some people.	AtheistCrusader	Nov 19	#367
PLEASE PEOPLE read this article!!!	marions ghost	Nov 18	#106
I still think they stole Ohio in 2004	edhopper	Nov 18	#90
Me too, and I know exactly how they did it and who did. That's why I know this is BS thru and thru	Coyotl	Nov 18	#124
Are you saying that	edhopper	Nov 18	#128
The President's narrow victories in numerous states laid to rest the issue	grantcart	Nov 18	#93
anonymous	heaven05	Nov 18	#98
Blind faith without evidence is no protection.	HooptieWagon	Nov 18	#193
I	heaven05	Nov 18	#198
Voter supression makes a fix possible.	JimDandy	Nov 18	#197
If Rove is EVER prosecuted,	Are_grits_groceries	Nov 18	#110
+1000	heaven05	Nov 18	#112
"If you think the Dems are lily white in the area of voter fraud, I have a bridge to sell you."	ProSense	Nov 18	#123
My bad.	Are_grits_groceries	Nov 18	#126
exactly	heaven05	Nov 19	#344
The anonymous claim that it hacked into Rove's vote-tampering	JDPriestly	Nov 18	#114
K&R	arely staircase	Nov 18	#118
If you want "evidence" vote for someone who will give you "investigations"	Eyes of the World	Nov 18	#130
Just maybe this anonymous stuff is all made up.	longship	Nov 18	#132
Snicker	nadinbrzezinski	Nov 18	#133
No, Anonymous is not going to take the risk....	OldDem2012	Nov 18	#134
"Where's your evidence Anonymous was not able to do what they claimed to have done?"	ProSense	Nov 18	#137
LOL. You're normally a smart poster, but you just don't get Anonymous, do you? nt.	OldDem2012	Nov 18	#231
Right. There is no way for them...	Wait Wut	Nov 18	#149
There is plent of evidence from 2000 on why does the Obama administration need	aandegoons	Nov 18	#135
And if the Republicans win in 2016	RomneyLies	Nov 18	#138
The real problem with the bogus Anon Rove Idiocy is	Coyotl	Nov 18	#140
Where is the evidence that Anonymous claims they hacked the election	toddaa	Nov 18	#144
This is the most sensible "no they didn't" post in this thread. I suspect you are 100% correct,	Dark n Stormy Knight	Nov 19	#331
They have said enough that any competent ivestigative/intelligence organization should be able	geckosfeet	Nov 18	#152
Totally agreed	treestar	Nov 18	#153
Karl we are watching	pipewrench	Nov 18	#156
"We watched as Karl’s speared ORCA"	ProSense	Nov 18	#161
It started...	DirtyDawg	Nov 18	#157
I prefer that Anonymous keep their info to themselves	Cirque du So-What	Nov 18	#163
Yup, better to protect the crooks from being investigated. n/t	ProSense	Nov 18	#168
Exactly	meanit	Nov 18	#221
We the people have the right to bring to light from the shadows.	Hutzpa	Nov 18	#166
Rove's behavior to me proves he	lalalu	Nov 18	#167
Does anyone seriously think Rove did NOT try to tamper with the results?	HopeHoops	Nov 18	#173
I thought the statement explained that.	sofa king	Nov 18	#174
Great post.	go west young man	Nov 19	#313
Responses indicate that we're pretty scattered on this election fraud issue.	Gregorian	Nov 18	#175
Anonymous and tactics	The Traveler	Nov 18	#176
What Sort of Evidence?	Skraxx	Nov 18	#179
That's why she's asking for it	Fumesucker	Nov 18	#183
"Seriously, there's really nothing they could present to prove their claims."	ProSense	Nov 18	#185
Yes, What Do You Think Would Suffice to "Prove" Their Claims?	Skraxx	Nov 18	#201
There's always a counterclaim to any evidence	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#228
Just Because People Believe It's PLAUSIBLE Doesn't Mean People Believe It Definitely Happened	Skraxx	Nov 18	#298
There isn't even circumstantial evidence.	randome	Nov 18	#299
Where Do I Make That Assumption?	Skraxx	Nov 18	#300
Then I apologize.	randome	Nov 18	#301
Of Course We Won It For Who We Are, No Doubt	Skraxx	Nov 18	#302
Sorry but that's not their job. They have brought forth suspicions that this happened.	Cleita	Nov 18	#181
You don't start investigations based on anonymous suspicions.	ProSense	Nov 18	#182
I think there is more than a loony suspicion here. I believe a warrant to investigate the	Cleita	Nov 18	#190
exactly	heaven05	Nov 18	#195
That has nothing	ProSense	Nov 18	#199
Got it.	Cleita	Nov 18	#200
Here's what I know having watched this closely at the time re: Ohio + Anonymous	flamingdem	Nov 18	#194
Oh, THIS is an interesting post Flamingdem	Matariki	Nov 18	#217
There has been proof since 2000, and during every election since. there are books and movies on the s	robinlynne	Nov 18	#204
DU rec...nt	SidDithers	Nov 18	#205
Rove is dogshit, he is out of the loop	Rex	Nov 18	#206
That would be suicide. CBS news: Republican IT Guru Dies In Plane Crash	Zorra	Nov 18	#207
Who would get killed? n/t	ProSense	Nov 18	#209
That's what nobody wants to find out. nt	Zorra	Nov 18	#308
BIG Money plays for keeps.	WinkyDink	Nov 18	#259
If it would have been me who did it	InsultComicDog	Nov 18	#208
Here's my two cents. The people who would know for sure have enough info,	rzemanfl	Nov 18	#211
Rec.	allrevvedup	Nov 18	#215
Interesting thought experiments: what evidence would satisfy vote fraud	coalition_unwilling	Nov 18	#224
I will go much more modest: what evidence would convince me of this particular claim	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#232
I really think anonymous/wikileaks/Fitrakis jumped the gun, understandably they believed	flamingdem	Nov 18	#235
Fair enough. I'm a big believer in Occam's Razor and, barring presentation	coalition_unwilling	Nov 18	#237
What if the point is that the evidence can't be produced?	sofa king	Nov 18	#258
That's fine...I've said throughout this thread that there's nothing wrong with	alcibiades_mystery	Nov 18	#261
I'll bet we can agree on this, too:	sofa king	Nov 19	#358
You need to look at the stuff Mike Collins has published on algorithmic vote flipping.	reusrename	Nov 18	#269
I'm sure Anon will give us the whole story when, where and how they want to. They keep their id's	judesedit	Nov 18	#244
I am perfectly happy	James48	Nov 18	#248
Congressman John Conyers had plenty of evidence	eyewall	Nov 18	#249
What if it can no longer BE proven, being a transitory and random hacking program?	WinkyDink	Nov 18	#252
that is what is great about anonymous	argiel1234	Nov 18	#263
one part of me thinks	maindawg	Nov 18	#265
Give me a break!	RoccoR5955	Nov 18	#266
No,	ProSense	Nov 18	#270
So you do not believe that reveling the code	RoccoR5955	Nov 19	#338
Agree with you	marions ghost	Nov 18	#272
Wow. I'm surprised so many people are falling for this.	aletier_v	Nov 18	#274
Well, why don't you elucidate just HOW it "was a joke," m-kay? Rove wasn't & isn't laughing.	WinkyDink	Nov 18	#276
That technical description? It's Wizard of Oz mumbo jumbo.	aletier_v	Nov 18	#277
So...you're Anonymous? OMG! All this time and we didn't know!	randome	Nov 18	#285
Your concern about Rove is touching	argiel1234	Nov 18	#289
Anonymous won't be Anonymous	bucolic_frolic	Nov 18	#282
*Ahem* CLINT CURTIS, anybody?	TrollBuster9090	Nov 18	#286
And?	ProSense	Nov 18	#303
Agreed!	TrollBuster9090	Nov 18	#307
Recommended.	William769	Nov 18	#304
It's the left-wing version of Bengazhi	NightOwwl	Nov 18	#305
In olden days code was released	PATRICK	Nov 18	#306
On the other hand...	MrMickeysMom	Nov 18	#311
I haven't found really anything on Rove on AnonNews which is interesting.	rightsideout	Nov 19	#328
"This isn't a movie.....This is real life, and Rove needs to be investigated if	merrily	Nov 19	#329
Because we all accept Romney lied to American voters	muriel_volestrangler	Nov 19	#354
Accepting that Romney was lying does not mean he was not also a felon.	merrily	Nov 19	#356
The OP isn't about an investigation of Anonymous, though	muriel_volestrangler	Nov 19	#365
Thank you for that SENSible post, ProSense.