Obama to Hold Private Swear-in Ceremony for Second Presidential Term
Wednesday, November 21, 2012 14:54
Advertisement
Something is not right in America, take 2.
<a
href='http://opx.beforeitsnews.com/delivery/ck.php?n=aa00448f&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE'
target='_blank'><img
src='http://opx.beforeitsnews.com/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=20&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&amp;n=aa00448f'
border='0' alt='' /></a>
By Shepard Ambellas
theintelhub.com
November 20, 2012
One month from now on January 20, 2013, President Obama will be required by law to be sworn-in for his second presidential term by noon. However, something mysterious is happening again with the ceremony raising the eyebrows of some.
Since the 20th falls on a Sunday, a private ceremony will be held signifying the possibility of fraud as the “public” ceremony will be held the following day.
The fact is that even a deviation by even one single word during the ceremony (as admitted by Chief Justice Roberts in 2009) could signify an unlawful and unconstitutional swear-in as we saw four years ago at the public ceremony. Shortly after another “private” ceremony was held which caused quite a controversy at the time. Some speculate that the administration was hiding something as an executive order was signed by President Obama shortly after hiding all his records and possibly CIA activity.
The Washington Times reported on January 21, 2009 that, “President Obama took the oath of office a second time Wednesday night during a private ceremony at the White House, one day after the flubbing of the oath on Inauguration Day”….“We believe that the oath of office was administered effectively and that the President was sworn in appropriately yesterday. But the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of an abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath a second time.”
In a shocking interview on Tru News (18:00 in) startling information on Barack Obama was brought fourth.
According to the interview, the man known only as Al is a debt collector who actually voted for Obama.
During a recent skip tracing procedure on a Chicago debtor (a procedure carried out to verify data on the client; i.e. addresses, phone numbers, friends, social security numbers, etc.), Al came across a startling discovery when pulling the clients data. Michelle Obama pulled up (on the computer) as the debtors neighbor back in the 90′s.
Out of curiosity Al clicked on Michelle Obamas name (link) and this allegedly pulled upBarack Obama’s name Chicago home address of 5046 S. Greenwood Ave, strangely enough owned by Obama’s accountant (according to AL).
Also allegedly displayed in Barack Obama’s file was the allias name of Harrison J. Bounel.
Upon further investigation 6 different pin #’s in 6 years were assigned to the property — along with other evidence, Al believes that this type behavior signifies a multi layered real estate finance transaction.
The social security number 042-68-445 also allegedly appeared in Obama’s file.
The file also allegedly showed trusts and a $1.2 million loan taken out from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.
If all the allegations are true — this suggests real estate fraud at minimum, and the possible fact that Obama’s house is a CIA safe house.
52 former addresses of Obama allegedly popped up as well.
It has also been revealed that Obama’s birth certificate posted on the official White House web site is only digital (not a real certificate) and has been altered in many ways.
This is extremely bothering and should be the major issue at hand. Article II, Section I of the US Constitution states;
In fact the whole “birther” issue has indeed been turned into a spectacle, not from the “birthers” themselves or people such as Donald Trump, but rather from the establishment and the controlled press.“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.” - Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution.
On every major news network across the board, echos of the same rhetoric bounce down the halls and out the TV screens spewing endless propaganda and lies at the American people surrounding this very important issue.
The real issue goes much deeper.
The true issue surrounding this is monumental, and contrary to what others are saying, it is frankly the most important issue at hand that Americans are facing right now.
Birth certificates have to be presented in a variety of circumstances. Some reasons include enrolling your child in little league, acquiring a driver’s license (in some states), and so on.
All department of Defense positions will require a birth certificate as well. And it doesn’t stop there. In fact, most people who have enrolled in the military can tell you that stringent background checks are done, including contacting various childhood friends of the possible enlistment.
Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution was not put in place to be taken lightly. This is literally the frontline defense when it comes to warding off a foreign terrorist from gaining control of the helm of the United States of America.
A potential foreign terrorist grabbing full control of the nuclear button, the entire U.S. military, all government employees, soldiers, and assets and access to print trillions in fiat currency and/or give trillions bailouts to private interests, terror cells, and just plain comrades of a possible global crime syndicate via the Federal Reserve Bank; sounds important in my opinion.
If a “Rent-A-Cop” (security guard) needs such guidelines, surely the President does as well, this should be a no brainer. Especially when the entire nuclear arsenal is in the Presidents control.
In fact, maybe they should go even further than that, expanding on the constitution. Maybe someone in charge of over 1500 nuclear weapons, should very well almost have to submit a DNA sample. Why not? You have to pee in a cup submitting DNA to work at some of the most mundane jobs (Just a thought).
The following is a recap of this article so far (to help put things in perspective):
• I have outlined how it is truly a matter of national security and world security to let just anyone have the control of the U.S. Presidency
• I have pointed out that lower ranking positions/carriers/licenses require individuals to submit their long-form birth certificate
• I have defined how racism truly is not the underlying issue (as the media would like you to believe)
• I have pointed out the “Operation Mockingbird” type rhetoric we are seeing in the media surrounding this issue
• I have also established to true importance of this issue and how it is not a distraction (as most media would like you to believe)
Furthermore reporters such as Anderson Cooper and other icons such as Whoopi Goldberg continue to project the image that this issue is dead now following President Barack Obama’s release of the “alleged” long-form birth certificate (which by the way, is not recognized by the state of Hawaii as the official document at this time due to the fact that Obama had the law changed due to various lawsuits surrounding his citizenship including U.S. Supreme Court cases regarding this matter) this is pointed out by the Canada Free Press in the following excerpt;
“In order to accommodate Dictator-in-Chief Obama’s inability or refusal to provide his long form (NOT the short form COLB that is provided for even foreign-born residents of Hawaii) birth certificate, in April the State of Hawaii changed it policy on ALL long form birth certificates. Former director of the Hawaii Health Department Chiyome Fukino—who had been under fire for apparently acting as Obama’s agent in refusing to release his long form birth certificate to anyone—announced on 10 April that Hawaii will no longer provide legitimate long form birth certificates to anyone who was actually born in Hawaii.” –
No comments:
Post a Comment