View results
The radical feminists’ push for universal access to contraception
went on steroids with the just-released report from the United Nations
Population Fund (UNFPA).
Its annual report, “The State of World Population 2012: By Choice,
Not by Chance: Family Planning, Human Rights and Development,” was
released in numerous languages and in more than 100 capitals around the
world, including Berlin, Geneva, Madrid, Paris, Tokyo and Washington.
The basic message of the report is that contraception is a “human
right” that is fundamental to the “sustainable development” of nations.
Making contraception a “human right” enables the UNFPA (formerly the
U.N. Fund for Population Activities) to support those people around the
world who want to “transform gender attitudes and cultural barriers
that impede access to and use of family planning.”
The proclamation that family planning is a “human right” stakes out
the territory for U.N. dominance over individual states’ national
sovereignty. Put bluntly, the move is modern-day colonialism. Further,
such a move puts nations under obligation to implement the UNFPA
declaration and requires them to put down any local defiance.
Clearly, “ensuring universal access” to family planning means
challenging traditional and local practices — another way of saying
that any disagreement is to be squelched, and that freedom of religion
and freedom of speech are irrelevant when family planning “rights” are
at stake. Ironically, the pro-abortion champions of the UNFPA goals
have the temerity to state they are justified by the claim that
reducing unintended pregnancies would mean fewer abortions.
Throughout the report, words like “all” and “everyone” pile up as the
UNFPA declares its intent that “everyone” in “all” nations has a
“human right” for family planning and that nothing can stand in the way
of implementing the UNFPA’s family-planning goals around the world.
This year, they especially stress the need for “family planning” for
“those who are young and unmarried.”
The UNFPA focuses on what it calls the negative consequences of
ignoring family planning (poverty, poor health and gender inequality).
It also points to the positive “multiplier” effect of empowering women
by boosting their labor force participation. The arguments for access
to contraception are framed against a backdrop of “religious
conservatives blocking” access to contraceptives, especially for those
who need access “most desperately” — the young and those in developing
nations.
All these reasons constitute ammunition for the women’s rights
advocates who have long promoted the idea that family planning is a
“human right.” Their agenda is also their rationale for seizing control
over billions of dollars on the grounds that family planning is a
vital, integral part of nations’ development priorities. The UNFPA
claims that it would be a “sound investment” to apply more than $4
billion to address the “unmet” needs of 222 million women.
Keep in mind that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others
contributed significantly to the $5 billion already committed at the
London family-planning summit earlier this year.
Keep in mind, too, that the UNFPA report brands as unacceptable any
and all cultural or religious objections to contraception, including
sterilization, IUDs and emergency contraceptives like Plan B and Ella
(which many consider to be abortifacients because they prevent a
fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus).
The champion of “women’s liberation” that it is, the UNFPA
nevertheless sees nothing wrong with encroaching on liberty by forcing
believers around the world to give up their deeply held,
long-established religious convictions in order to grant someone else’s
far-fetched, newly minted “human right.”
While women around the world long to be free from hunger and desire
the opportunity for an education, the U.N. talks about “family
planning” as a “human right.” Many of the targeted nations are
desperate for clean water and basic sanitation. Untold multitudes of
women in the targeted nations lack basic health supplies like aspirin
and penicillin. Many women in those nations are affected by health
problems (like female genital mutilation and obstetric fistulas) and
safety issues (like sex trafficking and rape) — and the U.N. sends
condoms.
Meanwhile, Diane Stewart, the UNFPA director of information and
external relations, focuses her attention and energy on the “global
challenge” of removing all legal, cultural and financial barriers to
accessing contraception and other family-planning measures — barriers
that are “an infringement of women’s rights.” Based on her own
particular set of values, she takes exception to the fact that in many
cultures, women are encouraged to have large families and to avoid or
minimize the use of contraceptives.
In an interview with Cheryl Wetzstein of The Washington Times, Rep.
Carolyn B. Maloney, New York Democrat, linked the UNFPA report to the
re-election of President Obama. While she praised the fact that
Americans would continue to receive family-planning services, she
declared, “Women and men everywhere need access to education,
counseling and services on birth control and legal, safe abortion. This
is a human rights issue.”
With the establishment of taxpayer-funded contraceptives and
abortions through Obamacare, religious liberty has been compromised in
the United States. Sadly, our nation — through its strong-arm tactics
at the UNFPA — is taking on the “global challenge” of infringing on the
religious liberties of people throughout the world
Read more: CROUSE: U.N. declares contraception basic human right - Washington Times
http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/22/un-declares-contraception-basic-human-right/?page=1#ixzz2DCOf8WJ5
The radical feminists’ push for universal access to contraception went on steroids with the just-released report from the
United Nations Population Fund (
UNFPA).
Its
annual report, “The State of World Population 2012: By Choice, Not by
Chance: Family Planning, Human Rights and Development,” was released in
numerous languages and in more than 100 capitals around the world,
including Berlin, Geneva, Madrid, Paris, Tokyo and Washington. The basic
message of the report is that contraception is a “human right” that is
fundamental to the “sustainable development” of nations.
Making contraception a “human right” enables the
UNFPA (formerly the
U.N. Fund for Population Activities)
to support those people around the world who want to “transform gender
attitudes and cultural barriers that impede access to and use of family
planning.”
The proclamation that family planning is a “human right” stakes out the territory for
U.N.
dominance over individual states’ national sovereignty. Put bluntly,
the move is modern-day colonialism. Further, such a move puts nations
under obligation to implement the
UNFPA declaration and requires them to put down any local defiance.
Clearly,
“ensuring universal access” to family planning means challenging
traditional and local practices — another way of saying that any
disagreement is to be squelched, and that freedom of religion and
freedom of speech are irrelevant when family planning “rights” are at
stake. Ironically, the pro-abortion champions of the
UNFPA
goals have the temerity to state they are justified by the claim that
reducing unintended pregnancies would mean fewer abortions.
Throughout the report, words like “all” and “everyone” pile up as the
UNFPA
declares its intent that “everyone” in “all” nations has a “human
right” for family planning and that nothing can stand in the way of
implementing the
UNFPA’s
family-planning goals around the world. This year, they especially
stress the need for “family planning” for “those who are young and
unmarried.”
The
UNFPA
focuses on what it calls the negative consequences of ignoring family
planning (poverty, poor health and gender inequality). It also points to
the positive “multiplier” effect of empowering women by boosting their
labor force participation. The arguments for access to contraception are
framed against a backdrop of “religious conservatives blocking” access
to contraceptives, especially for those who need access “most
desperately” — the young and those in developing nations.
All
these reasons constitute ammunition for the women’s rights advocates who
have long promoted the idea that family planning is a “human right.”
Their agenda is also their rationale for seizing control over billions
of dollars on the grounds that family planning is a vital, integral part
of nations’ development priorities. The
UNFPA claims that it would be a “sound investment” to apply more than $4 billion to address the “unmet” needs of 222 million women.
Keep
in mind that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others
contributed significantly to the $5 billion already committed at the
London family-planning summit earlier this year.
Keep in mind, too, that the
UNFPA
report brands as unacceptable any and all cultural or religious
objections to contraception, including sterilization, IUDs and emergency
contraceptives like Plan B and Ella (which many consider to be
abortifacients because they prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in
the uterus).
The champion of “women’s liberation” that it is, the
UNFPA
nevertheless sees nothing wrong with encroaching on liberty by forcing
believers around the world to give up their deeply held,
long-established religious convictions in order to grant someone else’s
far-fetched, newly minted “human right.”
While women around the world long to be free from hunger and desire the opportunity for an education, the
U.N.
talks about “family planning” as a “human right.” Many of the targeted
nations are desperate for clean water and basic sanitation. Untold
multitudes of women in the targeted nations lack basic health supplies
like aspirin and penicillin. Many women in those nations are affected by
health problems (like female genital mutilation and obstetric fistulas)
and safety issues (like sex trafficking and rape) — and the
U.N. sends condoms.
Meanwhile, Diane Stewart, the
UNFPA
director of information and external relations, focuses her attention
and energy on the “global challenge” of removing all legal, cultural and
financial barriers to accessing contraception and other family-planning
measures — barriers that are “an infringement of women’s rights.” Based
on her own particular set of values, she takes exception to the fact
that in many cultures, women are encouraged to have large families and
to avoid or minimize the use of contraceptives.
In an interview with Cheryl Wetzstein of The Washington Times, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, New York Democrat, linked the
UNFPA
report to the re-election of President Obama. While she praised the
fact that Americans would continue to receive family-planning services,
she declared, “Women and men everywhere need access to education,
counseling and services on birth control and legal, safe abortion. This
is a human rights issue.”
With the establishment of
taxpayer-funded contraceptives and abortions through Obamacare,
religious liberty has been compromised in the United States. Sadly, our
nation — through its strong-arm tactics at the
UNFPA — is taking on the “global challenge” of infringing on the religious liberties of people throughout the world.
Story Continues →
Read more:
CROUSE: U.N. declares contraception basic human right - Washington Times http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/22/un-declares-contraception-basic-human-right/?page=1#ixzz2DCO2LIuM
Follow us:
@washtimes on Twitter
The radical feminists’ push for universal access to contraception went on steroids with the just-released report from the
United Nations Population Fund (
UNFPA).
Its
annual report, “The State of World Population 2012: By Choice, Not by
Chance: Family Planning, Human Rights and Development,” was released in
numerous languages and in more than 100 capitals around the world,
including Berlin, Geneva, Madrid, Paris, Tokyo and Washington. The basic
message of the report is that contraception is a “human right” that is
fundamental to the “sustainable development” of nations.
Making contraception a “human right” enables the
UNFPA (formerly the
U.N. Fund for Population Activities)
to support those people around the world who want to “transform gender
attitudes and cultural barriers that impede access to and use of family
planning.”
The proclamation that family planning is a “human right” stakes out the territory for
U.N.
dominance over individual states’ national sovereignty. Put bluntly,
the move is modern-day colonialism. Further, such a move puts nations
under obligation to implement the
UNFPA declaration and requires them to put down any local defiance.
Clearly,
“ensuring universal access” to family planning means challenging
traditional and local practices — another way of saying that any
disagreement is to be squelched, and that freedom of religion and
freedom of speech are irrelevant when family planning “rights” are at
stake. Ironically, the pro-abortion champions of the
UNFPA
goals have the temerity to state they are justified by the claim that
reducing unintended pregnancies would mean fewer abortions.
Throughout the report, words like “all” and “everyone” pile up as the
UNFPA
declares its intent that “everyone” in “all” nations has a “human
right” for family planning and that nothing can stand in the way of
implementing the
UNFPA’s
family-planning goals around the world. This year, they especially
stress the need for “family planning” for “those who are young and
unmarried.”
The
UNFPA
focuses on what it calls the negative consequences of ignoring family
planning (poverty, poor health and gender inequality). It also points to
the positive “multiplier” effect of empowering women by boosting their
labor force participation. The arguments for access to contraception are
framed against a backdrop of “religious conservatives blocking” access
to contraceptives, especially for those who need access “most
desperately” — the young and those in developing nations.
All
these reasons constitute ammunition for the women’s rights advocates who
have long promoted the idea that family planning is a “human right.”
Their agenda is also their rationale for seizing control over billions
of dollars on the grounds that family planning is a vital, integral part
of nations’ development priorities. The
UNFPA claims that it would be a “sound investment” to apply more than $4 billion to address the “unmet” needs of 222 million women.
Keep
in mind that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others
contributed significantly to the $5 billion already committed at the
London family-planning summit earlier this year.
Keep in mind, too, that the
UNFPA
report brands as unacceptable any and all cultural or religious
objections to contraception, including sterilization, IUDs and emergency
contraceptives like Plan B and Ella (which many consider to be
abortifacients because they prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in
the uterus).
The champion of “women’s liberation” that it is, the
UNFPA
nevertheless sees nothing wrong with encroaching on liberty by forcing
believers around the world to give up their deeply held,
long-established religious convictions in order to grant someone else’s
far-fetched, newly minted “human right.”
While women around the world long to be free from hunger and desire the opportunity for an education, the
U.N.
talks about “family planning” as a “human right.” Many of the targeted
nations are desperate for clean water and basic sanitation. Untold
multitudes of women in the targeted nations lack basic health supplies
like aspirin and penicillin. Many women in those nations are affected by
health problems (like female genital mutilation and obstetric fistulas)
and safety issues (like sex trafficking and rape) — and the
U.N. sends condoms.
Meanwhile, Diane Stewart, the
UNFPA
director of information and external relations, focuses her attention
and energy on the “global challenge” of removing all legal, cultural and
financial barriers to accessing contraception and other family-planning
measures — barriers that are “an infringement of women’s rights.” Based
on her own particular set of values, she takes exception to the fact
that in many cultures, women are encouraged to have large families and
to avoid or minimize the use of contraceptives.
In an interview with Cheryl Wetzstein of The Washington Times, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, New York Democrat, linked the
UNFPA
report to the re-election of President Obama. While she praised the
fact that Americans would continue to receive family-planning services,
she declared, “Women and men everywhere need access to education,
counseling and services on birth control and legal, safe abortion. This
is a human rights issue.”
With the establishment of
taxpayer-funded contraceptives and abortions through Obamacare,
religious liberty has been compromised in the United States. Sadly, our
nation — through its strong-arm tactics at the
UNFPA — is taking on the “global challenge” of infringing on the religious liberties of people throughout the world.
Read more:
CROUSE: U.N. declares contraception basic human right - Washington Times http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/22/un-declares-contraception-basic-human-right/#.ULDQ0cMheoM.twitter#ixzz2DCNkNMx8
Follow us:
@washtimes on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment