Beware of Beinart
Peter Beinart's
notoriety has gone to his head, and his analytical skills have been
enlisted in the service of the devil. Beinart is now pumping up Hamas
and bashing Israel. He's gone off the rails and become a purveyor of
dangerous policy proposals that advance enemy aspirations.
According to an
insidious article he penned this week, Hamas is the victim of
backwards-looking Western policy. Inverting cause and effect, Beinart
asserts that Hamas is obstructionist and violent because it hasn't been
fairly and properly "engaged." Poor Hamas, you see, has never been given
an "incentive" to abide by a cease-fire.
In Beinart's contrary
world, America and Israel are responsible for radicalizing Hamas. It's
the nasty Israeli blockade of Gaza, and the maximalist, over-the-top,
and "nonessential" Quartet principles (recognize Israel, renounce
violence and accept past peace agreements) that are responsible for
pushing Hamas toward rejectionism. Beinart plaints that "By isolating
Hamas, America and Israel are giving Hamas every incentive to try and
blow up any peace agreement that Abbas signs."
Israel's bombing of
Hamas rocket sites and its elimination of those responsible for Hamas'
missile programs is, according to Beinart, a major part of the problem.
These Israeli strikes only make Hamas popular, at Palestinian Authority
President Mahmoud Abbas' expense. This allows Beinart to get in another
dig at Israel. Israel is weakening Abbas' Palestinian Authority by
defending itself against Hamas. The inversions and perversions in
Beinart's arguments here are legendary.
I know that you'll find
this hard to believe, but Beinart's insane solution is to undercut
Abbas, and "incentivize" and empower Hamas in the West Bank. Beinart is
convinced that if Hamas were given the "freedom to operate as a
political party in the West Bank and a more open border with Egypt — it
would think hard before allowing rocket attacks that imperiled those
gains."
Incredibly, Beinart
seeks to anchor this co-option proposal in Israel's worst strategic
mistake, the Oslo Accords — except that Beinart considers this to be a
swell precedent. "Dialogue with the PLO was once deemed unthinkable
too," he intones, "and over time Israeli leaders realized that they were
better off trying to influence it politically" as opposed to destroying
it militarily. Beinart would now have Israel do the same with Hamas:
"Shape a political strategy that maximizes the chances of Hamas
eventually accepting the two-state solution, something that some Hamas
leaders, at some moments, have publicly entertained."
Beinart's advice is
doubly appalling: He asks Israel to go down the same colossally-mistaken
and nearly-mortal path it took with Oslo and he manufactures hints of
non-existent Hamas moderation to justify this. He wants to duplicate in
the West Bank the Islamic open-air prison and Iranian-vassal state in
Gaza that Hamas has built. He wants to convince Israel that it would be
wise to do so and he wants Washington to press Israel to do so.
Maybe we should run
Beinart's bizarre ideas by the families of Fatah men tortured and
literally chopped to pieces by Hamas militiamen when they overran Gaza
in 2007. Maybe we should have Beinart screen Hamas leaders for us in
order to discover the respectful and reliable partners he is sure Israel
will find among them.
Or maybe we should tell
Peter Beinart to jump in the lake. He can no longer credibly claim to
have Israel's best interests at heart. He can't be taken seriously as an
analyst and I wouldn't buy a used car from him either.
Beinart seems to be
travelling down the stale, crotchety and malignant road previously
plowed by Henry Siegman and Roger Cohen. Ugh! It's a road for people who
are out to save Israel from itself and despite itself; a road that is
paved with self-serving distortions and a great deal of faux pas
moralizing. It's the postulation of a world where Israel is always
radicalizing the situation; where Israel is eroding the middle ground;
where Israel is making agreements impossible; where Israel is "stuck in
the patterns of the past." All the while, the Arabs and these
mighty-and-weighty writers, of course, are lighting the way forward with
sagacity and moderation.
It is always so much
easier for Beinart and his "fellow travelers" (I use the phrase
purposefully) to prevail on the one who consistently takes the high road
to turn the other cheek. But this is not the path to durable
resolution. Constructive resolution — short and long term — will not
come by indulging Hamas. Rather it will be the result of holding Hamas
and its supporters accountable; getting them to accept responsibility
for both the immediate confrontation and the chronic conflict.
Tons of ink was devoted
to defending and attacking Peter Beinart when he published his infamous
2010 article and best-selling 2102 book arguing that right-wing Israel
was responsible for a "crisis in Zionism" and for disaffiliation amongst
young American Jews. Out of both respect and disdain for him, I
refrained from joining the pile-on, even when Beinart began advocating a
"Zionist BDS" — a boycott of settlement goods. My restraint was
misplaced.
Beinart has gone over
to the dark side. An abode where Hamas are the good guys and Israel the
bad guy. Perhaps there is more fame and money to be made in that wicked
world.
|
WRITERS BLOGGERS CHRISTIANS WIFES MOTHER FIGHTERS FOR FREEDOM CHARLENE CLEO EIBEN CHARLENE ZECHENDER Alexandra Day Debra Fish JEFF WALLER charlene zechender
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Beware of Beinart
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment