Flavored Milk; Petition to Amend the Standard of Identity for Milk and 17 Additional Dairy Products
This article has a comment period that ends in 87 days
(05/21/2013)
Submit a formal comment
Read the 1 submitted public comment
Action
Notice; Request For Comments, Data, And Information.
Summary
The
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that the International
Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers
Federation (NMPF) have filed a petition requesting that the Agency amend
the standard of identity for milk and 17 other dairy products to
provide for the use of any safe and suitable sweetener as an optional
ingredient. FDA is issuing this notice to request comments, data, and
information about the issues presented in the petition.
Table of Contents Back to Top
- DATES:
- ADDRESSES:
- Electronic Submissions
- Written Submissions
- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
- I. IDFA and NMPF Petition
- II. Request for Comments
- III. References
- Footnotes
DATES: Back to Top
Submit either written or electronic comments by May 21, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Back to Top
You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2009-P-0147 by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions Back to Top
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions Back to Top
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper or CD-ROM submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received may be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. For additional information
on submitting comments, see the “Comments” heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov
and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this
document, into the “Search” box and follow the prompts and/or go to the
Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Back to Top
Daniel Y. Reese,
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-820), Food and Drug
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
240-402-2371.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Back to Top
I. IDFA and NMPF Petition Back to Top
The IDFA and NMPF jointly
submitted a citizen petition (Ref. 1) on March 16, 2009, requesting that
FDA amend the standard of identity in part 131 (21 CFR part 131)
for milk (§ 131.110). Specifically, the petition requests that FDA
amend § 131.110(c)(2) to allow the use of “any safe and suitable”
sweetener in optional characterizing flavoring ingredients used in milk.
[1]
The petition also requests that FDA similarly amend the
standards of identity for 17 other milk and cream products. Those
standards (hereinafter referred to as the “additional dairy standards”)
are as follows: Acidified milk (§ 131.111), cultured milk (§ 131.112),
sweetened condensed milk (§ 131.120), nonfat dry milk (§ 131.125),
nonfat dry milk fortified with vitamins A and D (§ 131.127), evaporated
milk (§ 131.130), dry cream (§ 131.149), heavy cream (§ 131.150), light
cream (§ 131.155), light whipping cream (§ 131.157), sour cream (§
131.160), acidified sour cream (§ 131.162), eggnog (§ 131.170),
half-and-half (§ 131.180), yogurt (§ 131.200), lowfat yogurt (§
131.203), and nonfat yogurt (§ 131.206). The petition asks that the
standards of identity for these products be amended to provide for the
use of any safe and suitable sweetener in the optional ingredients.
[2]
IDFA and NMPF request their
proposed amendments to the milk standard of identity to allow optional
characterizing flavoring ingredients used in milk (e.g., chocolate
flavoring added to milk) to be sweetened with any safe and suitable
sweetener—including non-nutritive sweeteners such as aspartame. IDFA and
NMPF state that the proposed amendments would promote more healthful
eating practices and reduce childhood obesity by providing for
lower-calorie flavored milk products. They state that lower-calorie
flavored milk would particularly benefit school children who, according
to IDFA and NMPF, are more inclined to drink flavored milk than
unflavored milk at school. As further support for the petition, IDFA and
NMPF state that the proposed amendments would assist in meeting several
initiatives aimed at improving the nutrition and health profile of food
served in the nation's schools. Those initiatives include state-level
programs designed to limit the quantity of sugar served to children
during the school day. Finally, IDFA and NMPF argue that the proposed
amendments to the milk standard of identity would promote honesty and
fair dealing in the marketplace and are therefore appropriate under
section 401 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 341).
The petition acknowledges that the use of non-nutritive sweeteners in optional characterizing flavoring ingredients
in milk is allowed under the existing regulatory scheme, with certain
additional requirements. The regulatory framework governing the naming
of standardized foods that do not fully comply with the relevant
standards of identity changed with the passage of the Nutrition Labeling
and Education Act of 1990 and FDA's rulemaking establishing the
Agency's requirements for foods named by use of a nutrient content claim
and a standardized term (§ 130.10 (21 CFR 130.10)).
Section 130.10(d) allows the addition of safe and suitable ingredients
to a food named by use of a nutrient content claim and a standardized
term when these ingredients are used to, among other things, add
sweetness to ensure that the modified food is not inferior in
performance characteristic to the standardized food even if such
ingredients are not specifically provided for by the relevant food
standard. Therefore, while the milk standard of identity in § 131.110
only provides for the use of “nutritive sweetener” in an optional
characterizing flavor, milk may contain a characterizing flavor that is
sweetened with a non-nutritive sweetener if the food's label bears a
nutrient content claim (e.g., “reduced calorie”) and the non-nutritive
sweetener is used to add sweetness to the product so that it is not
inferior in its sweetness property compared to its standardized
counterpart. However, IDFA and NMPF argue that nutrient content claims
such as “reduced calorie” are not attractive to children, and maintain
that consumers can more easily identify the overall nutritional value of
milk products that are flavored with non-nutritive sweeteners if the
labels do not include such claims. Further, the petitioners assert that
consumers do not recognize milk—including flavored milk—as necessarily
containing sugar. Accordingly, the petitioners state that milk flavored
with non-nutritive sweeteners should be labeled as milk without further
claims so that consumers can “more easily identify its overall
nutritional value.”
As to the additional dairy
standards, IDFA and NMPF state that administrative efficiency counsels
in favor of similar changes. As long as FDA is dedicating resources to
amending the standard of identity for milk, they argue, the Agency
should also amend the standards for these products at the same time.
They state that it is most efficient to consider all of the proposals
together. According to the petition, the requested changes to the
additional dairy standards present the same issues as the milk standard,
and it is therefore appropriate to consider all of the requested
changes together.
II. Request for Comments Back to Top
FDA requests that interested
persons submit comments, data, and information concerning the need for,
and the appropriateness of, amending the standard of identity for milk
and the additional dairy standards. FDA specifically requests comment
and supporting data, as appropriate, on the following matters:
1. The petition states that
amending the standard of identity for milk (§ 131.100) to allow the use
of “any safe and suitable” sweetener in optional characterizing
flavoring ingredients would promote honesty and fair dealing in the
interest of consumers by creating consistency in the naming of flavored
milk products because flavored milk could contain a non-nutritive
sweetener without bearing a nutrient content claim (e.g., “reduced
sugar”) as part of its name. Would the proposed amendments promote
honesty and fair dealing in the interest of consumers?
2. If the standard of identity
for milk is amended as requested by petitioners, milk manufacturers
could use non-nutritive sweeteners in flavored milk without a nutrient
content claim in its labeling. Will the inclusion of the non-nutritive
sweeteners in the ingredient statement provide consumers with sufficient
information to ensure that consumers are not misled regarding the
characteristics of the milk they are purchasing?
3. The petition states that
flavored milk labels that bear nutrient content claims such as “reduced
calorie” are unattractive to children. What, if any, data are available
on children's purchase habits with regard to flavored milks labeled as
“reduced calorie flavored milk,” “no sugar added,” “less sugar,” etc?
4. The petition states that if
FDA dedicates resources to amending the standard of identity for milk,
for purposes of administrative efficiency the Agency should also amend
the Additional Dairy Standards because the issues presented are the same
with respect to the use of non-nutritive sweeteners. Would amending the
Additional Dairy Standards as requested promote honesty and fair
dealing in the interest of consumers? If the labels of these products do
not bear nutrient content claims, would the inclusion of non-nutritive
sweeteners in the ingredient statements provide consumers with
sufficient information to distinguish between the two types of products
(i.e., sweetened with nutritive versus non-nutritive sweeteners) so that
consumers are not misled?
[3]
5. The petition notes that ice
cream is permitted to contain either a nutritive or non-nutritive
sweetener without the label bearing a nutrient content claim or
otherwise distinguishing the two types of products from one another. Are
the considerations underlying FDA amendments to the standard of
identity for ice cream
[4]
applicable to the requested amendments to the standard of identity for milk or the Additional Dairy Standards?
6. If the standard of identity
for milk and the Additional Dairy Standards are amended in the manner
requested by the petition, what will be the effect on search costs
[5]
for consumers who would like to determine whether a product contains a nutritive or non-nutritive sweetener?
After reviewing the comments
received, FDA will further evaluate the need for, and appropriateness
of, the amendments requested by IDFA and NMPF and will decide what
further actions are appropriate. For a copy of the petition filed by
IDFA and NMPF please go to: http://www.regulations.gov and insert “Docket No. FDA-2009-P-0147” into the “Search” box.
(Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321 et seq.)
III. References Back to Top
FDA has placed the following references on display. To view the references, go to http://www.regulations.gov
and insert the docket number(s), found in brackets in the heading of
this document, into the “Search” box. The references may also be seen in
the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
1. International Dairy Foods Association and the National Milk Producers Federation, Citizen Petition, March 16, 2009.
2. “ Frozen
Desserts: Removal of Standards of Identity for Ice Milk and Goat's Milk
Ice Milk; Amendment of Standards of Identity for Ice Cream and Frozen
Custard and Goat's Milk Ice Cream” (59 FR 47072, September 14, 1994).
Dated: February 14, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-03835 Filed 2-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
Footnotes Back to Top
1. Section 131.110(c)(2) currently allows the use of
“nutritive sweetener” in optional characterizing flavoring ingredients
used in milk.
Back to Context
2. The National Yogurt Association (NYA) submitted a citizen
petition on February 18, 2000 (Docket No. FDA-2000-P-0126) that
requested that FDA make similar changes to the standards of identity for
yogurt and cultured milk. Among other requested changes, the NYA
petition asked that FDA amend the standards of identity for yogurt and
cultured milk to permit the use of all safe and suitable sweeteners,
while also revoking the standards of identity for lowfat and nonfat
yogurt. In 2009, FDA proposed to grant the petition in part, and to deny
it in part. See“Milk and Cream Products and Yogurt
Products; Proposal to Revoke the Standards for Lowfat and Nonfat Yogurt
and to Amend the Standard for Yogurt” (74 FR 2443,
January 15, 2009). Thus, FDA has already requested comments on issues
that are similar to the issues IDFA and NMPF raise with respect to
yogurt, lowfat yogurt, nonfat yogurt, and cultured milk, and is
addressing those issues through the rulemaking initiated in response to
NYA's petition. Therefore, FDA is not currently requesting comments on
IDFA and NMPF's suggested amendments to the yogurt, lowfat yogurt,
nonfat yogurt, and cultured milk standards.
Back to Context
3. Although FDA requests comments relevant to the IDFA and
NMPF petition, FDA does not seek comments regarding the requested
amendments to the standards of identity for yogurt, lowfat yogurt,
nonfat yogurt, and cultured milk. FDA has already sought and collected
comments regarding similar amendments to those standards in a proposed
rulemaking. See 74 FR 2443.
Back to Context
4. FDA amended the standard of identity for ice cream to
allow for “any safe and suitable sweetener” to be used in ice cream. See “
Frozen Desserts: Removal of Standards of Identity for Ice Milk and
Goat's Milk Ice Milk; Amendment of Standards of Identity for Ice Cream
and Frozen Custard and Goat's Milk Ice Cream” (59 FR 47072, September
14, 1994) (Ref 2). Before FDA's amendment, the standard provided only
for “nutritive carbohydrate sweeteners.”
Back to Context
5. Search costs include the time and energy it would take an
average consumer to read a label and determine whether the product
contained the nutritive sweetener or the artificial sweetener.
Back to Context
No comments:
Post a Comment