Sunday, 8 April 2012
POPE SEATED ON SATAN'S THRONE The Babylonian pagan
worship of Nimrod, Semiramis, and the god-incarnate son extended throughout
the entire world and eventually assumed the name of Christianity
in Rome. paganism spread from Babylon to Rome by way of Pergamum.
The Babylon Kings, who were descended from Nimrod, served as both king and priest
of the pagan Babylonian Mystery religion, As priests, they bore the title "Pontifex
Maximus" (The Two Babylons, pp. 240-252) or "Supreme Pontiff,"
meaning "supreme pathfinder" or "bridge maker," representing "the path or connection
between this life and the next" (Baker's Pocket Dictionary of Religious
Terms, entry "Pontifex Maximus"). They ruled upon the throne
of Satan, which is the throne of Nimrod as the "hidden god" (The Two Babylons,
pp. 275-276).The last king to reign in Babylon was Belshazzar, who celebrated
the pagan Babylonian ritual using the sacred Jewish temple vessels which his
father King Nebuchadnezzar confiscated from the Jewish temple in 587 B.C.:
Belshazzar the king made a great feast for a thousand of his lords, and drank wine in the presence of the thousand.When he tasted the wine, Belshazzar gave the command to bring the gold and of silver vessels which his father Nebuchadnezzar had taken [in 587 B.C.] from the temple which had been in Jerusalem, that the king and his lords, his wives, and his concubines might drink from them. Then they brought the gold vessels that had been taken from the temple of the house of God which had been in Jerusalem; and the king and his lords, his wives, and his concubines drank from them. They drank wine, and praised the gods of gold and silver, bronze and iron, wood and stone.In the same hour the fingers of a man's hand appeared and wrote opposite the lampstand on the plaster of the wall of the king's palace; and the king saw the part of the hand that wrote. Then the king's countenance changed, and his thoughts troubled him, so that the joints of his hips were loosened and his knees knocked against each other....Then the fingers of the hand was sent from Him, and this writing was written. And this is the inscription that was written: MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN. This is the interpretation of each word. MENE: God has numbered your kingdom, and finished it; TEKEL: You have been weighed in the balances, and found wanting; PERES: Your kingdom has been divided, and given to the Medes and Persians....That very night Belshazzar, the king of the Chaldeans, was slain. And Darius the Mede received the kingdom, being about sixty-two years old (Daniel 5:1-30).
After the
death of Belshazzar in 539 B.C., the Persian Emperor Cyrus conquered Babylon
and forced the Babylonian princes to flee to Pergamum. They continued their
reign there as priest-kings of Babylonian paganism (The Two Babylons,
pp. 240-241).In 133 B.C., Attalus III, the last Babylonian King to rule in Pergamum,
willed his dominions to the Roman Caesar, and the kingdom of Pergamum merged
with the Roman Empire along with Satan-Nimrod's throne and the title "Pontifex
Maximus" (ibid., p. 241).
In 63 B.C., Julius
Caesar, who had been elected Pontifex Maximus, became emperor of Rome and vested
the office of Roman emperor with the priestly powers and functions of the Babylonian
Pontiff (Babylon Mystery Religion, p. 80). Henceforth, the title
Pontifex Maximus was used by the Roman Caesars as illustrated on a Roman coin
depicting the image of Augustus Caesar (27 B.C.-14 A.D.) with his title "Pont.
Max.," which is an abbreviation of Pontifex Maximus. Thus, the Roman emperors,
like the preceding Babylonian emperors, now served as priests of Babylonian
paganism, and bore the title Pontifex Maximus.
For centuries, Pergamum
remained the site of Nimrod's throne. With the appearance of Christianity, Babylonian
paganism threatened the early Christian church of Pergamum as related in the
Revelation given by the Messiah to his apostle John, who referred to Pergamum
as the seat of Satan's throne which is Nimrod's throne:
"And to the angel of the church in Pergamum write, 'These things says he who has the sharp two-edged sword:"I know your works, and where you dwell, where Satan's throne is [i.e., Nimrod"s Throne]. And you hold fast to my name and did not deny my faith even in the days in which Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was killed among you, where Satan dwells. But I have a few things against you, because you have there some who hold the doctrine of Balaam [pagan Babylonian trinity of Nimrod], who taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols, and to commit sexual immorality" (Revelation 2:12-14).
In 376
A.D., Gratian became the first Roman emperor to refuse the idolatrous title
of Pontifex Maximus (Babylon Mystery Religion, p. 80; The
Two Babylons, pp. 238, 247-252). He presented the Babylonian Throne,
or Satan-Nimrod's Throne to the bishop of Rome (The Two Babylons,
pp. 247-248).
By this time, the Roman
bishops had advanced in political power, and in 378 A.D., Bishop Damasus was
elected Pontifex Maximus, becoming the official pagan Babylonian priest seated
on Satan's throne in Rome. As such, the bishop converted the pagan Babylonian
temples of Rome into Christian churches and introduced the worship
of Nimrod, Semiramis and the god-incarnate son under the respective titles of
"god the father," "god the son" and "god the holy spirit." All the pomp and
ceremony that existed in ancient Babylon was now practiced as Roman
Christianity.
Before the Babylonian
conversion into Christianity, the early Christians were a small
cult surrounded by numerous Babylonian pagan temples. Historians, however, relate
the amazing "overnight" conversion of Romans to Christianity, which
coincided to a remarkable and unprecedented disappearance of paganism (ibid.,
pp. 250-251). In actuality, the Roman pagans did not convert to
Christianity; but rather, Bishop Damasus exercised his authority as head of'
Babylonian paganism in Rome, and replaced all the Christian elders with pagan
priests and continued the practice of the pagan Babylonian Mystery religion
under the name of Christianity. Henceforth, all the bishops of Rome
have donned the robes of Nimrod along with the title of Pontifex Maximus.
The Roman Catholic
bishops were viewed by most Christians as head of Christianity,
and entitled pope or "pater patrum" in Latin, that is, "father of the fathers,"
(Babylon Mystery Religion, p. 83; The Catholic Encyclopedia,
vol. 10, p. 403) despite the fact that Yeshua the Messiah forbade his followers
to refer to anyone as father except for the heavenly Father:
But you are not to be called rabbi [Hebrew for master or teacher, Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, entry "Rabbi"], for you have one teacher, and you are all brethren. And call no man your father [pope, derived from the Greek "papa" meaning father, Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, entry "Pope"] on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called masters, for you have one master, the Christ (Matthew 23:8-10).
Thus, like the Babylonian
emperors and the Roman Caesars before them, the pagan Roman Catholic popes were
seated on the throne of Satan, and possessed the title Pontifex Maximus (Supreme
Pathfinder...the pope, Baker's Pocket Dictionary of Religious Terms)
as displayed on a medal portraying Pope Leo X (1513-1521 A.D.) with the inscription
"Pont. Max.".
Further evidence supports
the fact that the papal office is the pagan Babylonian priesthood. Roman Catholic
popes not only bear the title Pontifex Maximus and are seated on Satan-Nimrod's
throne, but they also wear the scarlet robes of Nimrod and the miter of the
fish-god Dagon, plus they carry the shepherd's crook of Nimrod and the mystical
keys of Janus and Cybele, who were the pagan god and goddess representing Nimrod
and Semiramis respectively (Babylon Mystery Religion, pp. 83-90,
The Two Babylons, pp. 206-218).
The Roman bishops wore
only white robes until they received Satan's throne and the title Pontifex Maximus
(ibid., p. 111). Roman Catholic popes and cardinals now wear the
scarlet robes of Nimrod. The shepherd's crook or crosier carried by the pope
is the magical crook traced directly to Nimrod who was the first shepherd king
(Baker's Pocket Dictionary of Religious Terms, entry "Crosier";
The Two Babylons, p. 217). The miter worn by the pope represents
the mouth of a fish and was worn by the pagan Philistine fish-god Dagon (The
Two Babylons, pp. 216-217), which is another name for Nimrod (ibid.,
pp. 114, 215, 252). Also, the tiara worn by the popes is identical in shape
to that worn by the Philistine fish-god Nimrod (ibid., pp. 216-217).
HOW PAGAN IS THE POPE ?
Revelation 13:2 ... and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority The Hierarchy of the Roman Empire now called the Roman Church...
Vatican City is a landlocked state within the city of Rome, Italy. It is governed by the Bishop of Rome (called the Pope) are in fact clergymen.
It is the smallest sovereign state in the world.
Caesar Constintine began the "corporate takeover" by renaming all the old Roman offices, this evolution of name changing still occurs. Name changing allows a person to hide their tracks of origin.
Roman Empire offices & their modern names:
Roman Empire (Imperium Romanum) renamed: Roman Catholic Church
Curia (legal body of Senators) slight name change: Curia (legal body of Cardinals)
Roman Emperor renamed: Roman Pope (head of all church and state affairs)
Civil government matters of state: Extra-Ordinary affairs (matters of civil-state governments)
Religious orders matters: Church "ecclesiastical" matters
Roman College of Senators renamed: College of Cardinals
Magistrate of College of Senators renamed: Dean of College of Cardinals
Departments of the Roman Senatorial Curia renamed: Congregations
Political Ambassador renamed: Pro-Nuncio (highest civil ambassador sent to other governements, ie Wash.DC, London etc)
If a government has not signed a treaty with Rome which makes the Romans the head of the foreign country as certified in the Roman Code of Canon Law. This rebel nation which has no official ties has an ambassador called an Apostolic Delegate. The United States and the United Kingdom never allowed the Vatican to serve as their legal head until President Reagan quickly signed into law on January 10, 1984. This Treaty for the very first time in U.S. history recognized full diplomatic relations between the United States and the Vatican State.
In 1534 when the United Kingdom realized that the Treaty with the Vatican City-State made them subject to all the Popes rules they voided the treaty. Formal diplomatic relations between England and Vatican State were broken. Full diplomatic relations with the Pope's Vatican State were never restored for 448 years until 1982.
Roman Senators renamed: Cardinals
Roman Governors renamed: Archbishops
Roman Senator with no territory: Bishop (Code of Canon Law 376)
(Large) Roman Province renamed: Archdiocese
(Small) Roman Territory renamed: Diocese
Imperial Chair of Jupiter where Caesar sat renamed: Throne of St. Peter
Vestal Virgins renamed: Nuns
Pontifex Maximus (high priest of College of Senators) renamed: Supreme Pontiff of College of Cardinals
Pontiff or "high priest " of a pagan religious order (Zues, Apollo, Diana, Mars, Jupiter, Baal, Dionysys, Pythia etc) same name: Pontiff
A Pontiff (Latin: "pontifex") means bridge-builder or priest between man and the gods of the underworld.
The Roman Calender and Holy Days of the gods renamed: Calendar Holidays of the Saints
Voice of the gods speaking through Caesar: Ex-Cathedra: Voice of God speaking through Pope
Meeting of the Pontiffs (high priests) of the pagan religious orders renamed: Ecumenical Council of the Bishops
Legal act of creating a god (of a living or dead human, as was done to most of the Caesars) "Apotheosis of the Gods" renamed: Canonization of the Saints
A decree of Caesar (dictator for life): Pope's infalliable Dogma
Praying to a dead human god renamed: Praying to a saint
In the US the highest law of the land is the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in the Vatican State the Constitution is called the Code of Canon Law
Rom 1:18 ¶ For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in all unrighteousness;
false resurrection some 1500 years before Christ.
Gilgamesh
Vishnu
Nimrod
Osiris
Mars
Zeus
And then list off the respective Powers or Principalities or Fiefdoms that held to these beliefs and treats each of these different names above as though they are different people. Not so. They are al the same man, known by different names in their own native tongues. And then gives the idea that these were all separate and individual stories which allegedly happened in their own lands. Nothing could be further from the truth! It is the same story about the same man, with the name or title of the same man in many different tongues and languages! And to be honest, for the person or persons who made this movie to have "researched" this as well as they did to be so accurate on some aspects of this "Mystery Religion" of Osiris and then to miss this MOST OBVIOUS and EASY TO SEE TRUTH is really not all that likely or possible in my opinion.
Nimrod was known by this name amongst the Persians or Babylonians. After the confusion of tongues, and with now many languages, he was now known to the Egyptians as Osiris. To the Indians in India, he was known as Vishnu. To the Romans he was known as the great god Mars. To the Greeks, known as the god Zeus. Amongst the Nordic peoples in Central Europe, he was known as the god 'Woden.' All the same man, and all the same story. And it all revolved around the false resurrection of this god, which happened in Egypt.
In the same way today, Jesus Christ is known by many different names and titles throughout the earth. And I speak here of those who use the name along with the true account of the story of Jesus Christ. Does this mean that all of the Nations are telling accounts of their own individual story which happened in their own Nation? That each had their very own Savior? No! They are telling the same story of the same man, which happened in what was once known as Israel. In the same vein, all the different Powers, Principalities and Fiefdoms he speaks of having their own Savior account, goes back to the single story and account of the resurrection of Osiris.
Rome was an Empire who worshipped this false resurrection of Osiris. And all of the 'gods' associated with it. And the Roman Empire was never 'Christianized' or converted to Christ. And I can prove this 7 ways till Sunday. First of all, Empires cannot converted or receive salvation. It is only something which can happen on the individual level. Person by person.
The "Co-Opting of Christianity by Rome:"
The reason Pagan Rome 'Christianized' itself, was because there was one foe which they simply could never conquer. And this was the masses of people in its own Empire who were hearing about Christ and believing THAT story, rather than the false resurrection which Rome held to. And not consequently, the Roman Empire derived its very power from this false mystery religion and false resurrection of Nimrod or Osiris. As the Roman Caesar was the 'head' of these mystery religions, and as such could and did dictate the doctrine and dogma of its believers. e.g. Control of their lives in every way, shape or form. And because the Roman Caesar was 'lord' of this religion, he held the title of Pontifex Maximus, which means 'chief bridge-builder to the netherworld.' And as such demanded he be worshipped as god! Any who would not bow before Caesar and call him 'lord', would be imprisoned, tortured or put to death. They would be known as 'heretics' and as enemies of the Empire, and called subversive elements.
But they could not stop the spreading of this 'other resurrection' which was spreading like wild fire throughout the Empire, called 'Christianity' or 'the Way.' And for about 360 years tried to stomp it out by persecuting the Christians and putting them to death en mass by way of inquisition. Yet with each and every new wave of inquisitions, Christianity would then double, triple and quadruple. They would kill 300,000 Christians in a single swoop, and not just Christians, but any who dared not follow the false gods. And when they killed 300,000 people, 600,000 or 900,000 would then pop up in their place. They found themselves in a no win situation. As a matter of fact they found themselves in a losing battle where one day they would lose their Empire, and that the Christians would one day win, and rule this empire if for nothing else than their sheer numbers. The Roman Inquisitions all through the Empire was akin to throwing gas on an already hot and burning fire.
Pagan Romes Final Solution to the Christian Faith: Subvert it & Dominate it!
So what did they do to fix this situation? Nothing at first. For none of the Roman Caesars or Emperors had enough wisdom to handle the issue, yet. But then one day a man named Constantine was crowned Pontifex Maximus, or Caesar. And he had the solution and the wisdom to deal with this issue. At first he tried as his successors did to kill, pillage and burn the Christians. Until one day when it dawned upon him, and he "saw the darkness." e.g. A play of the words of seeing the Light..
He saw that it would advantageous to simply fake his own 'conversion.' And did so in 312AD. He had a 'vision' whereby he saw a giant cross in the sky, and , he now became a 'christian. ' It was here where Constantine started the co-opting of Christianity. He ordered the Empire to become 'christian' as he had become and 'saw the light.' e.g. Darkness.
The Renaming of the Roman Religious Orders; Corporate Takeover:
So what did the Roman Senate do? They complied of course, for what else can one do when ordered to do something by an egomaniacal madman who considered himself god? But in order to insure that the new 'converts' to 'christianity' would remain loyal to what he considered the 'true god' Osiris, and to ensure loyalty, the 'doctrine and dogma' of the scriptures would and could only be interpreted by who else? Yes, Pontifex Maximus or Caesar! They would water down the words of the scriptures and make them mean things never intended. They would change it to doublespeak. With this established now, a few more changes to the Roman Empire would need to be made to make this work. Their Orders of the Mystery Religions of Nimrod or Osiris would now be renamed. The Order of Osiris would now become known and renamed as 'The Secret Order of Jesus.' Thus, all of their Statues and Icons of Osiris would now become known as Jesus Christ. The False resurrection would now become center stage, but hidden. And they would continue exhorting the people to obey and worship these statues and icons without question or wavering. The Renaming of their False Gods:
The statues and idols of Semeramis, the 'queen of heaven' as she was known, would now be renamed to 'Mary.' The 'mother of god.' Remember Semeramis was the mother, and also the wife of Osiris. This same statue would remain and be worshipped still. But her name would be changed. Thus the Order of Semeramis, a military wing of the Roman Empire, of religious enforcement (similar to the Dominicans would later become) would now be renamed "The Secret Order of Mary."
Their great god Thor, Hercules & Jupiter (AKA-Shem, and all the same man and god in different languages) would now be renamed to become St. Peter. And thus the Order of Jupiter would now become the Secret Order of Peter. All of the statues you see in the Roman Catholic Church today are the very same statues and idols worshipped under the Roman Empire of their pagan gods. Only their names have been changed to protect the heresy. To protect the lie. To hide their origins. To confuse the people.
One thing would remain unchanged though. Their pompous regalia and religious garb would stay for the most part the same as before. The Caesar would still wear 'Dagons Mitre' and the 'Triple Crown' as before during religious ceremonies. He would still clothe himself in the White & Scarlet arrogant pomp we see still to this day! The Roman Senators, now known as "Roman Cardinals" would still war their ceremonial garb they used to wear at the religious festivals of the 'gods;' Only now they would wear them always. Their Priests would still give "the mass" as they did to the Pagan Roman Churches, but with all of the new names for the old pagan gods and false resurrection of Osiris. The Renaming of the Roman Government Offices & their New "Christian" Names:
They would need to change the names of their government offices and agencies as well, in order to hide the origins of their 'christianity.' The Roman Senate would now be renamed to become the 'Roman Curia.' The Roman Emperor would be renamed to become 'the Pope.' What was known as the office of 'Roman Office of Religious Ecclesiastical matters' would now be called "Church Ecclesiastical matters.' The Roman College of Senators would now be renamed to become "The College of Cardinals." The Throne of Jupiter which Caesar sat upon would now become known as the "Throne of St. Peter" But it is the very same throne which the Caesars sat upon! heres a list of this name changing and re-ordering of the Roman Empire government offices and agencies into their new 'christian names'first remember the matrix the whole world is enslaved by its roman papal deception
Morpheus : The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work... when you go to church... when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Neo : What truth?
Morpheus : That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into bondage. Into a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch. A prison for your mind.
Morpheus : I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it.: Roman Senators renamed: Cardinals
Roman Governors renamed: Archbishops
Roman Senator with no territory: Bishop (Code of Canon Law 376)
(Large) Roman Province renamed: Archdiocese
(Small) Roman Territory renamed: Diocese
Imperial Chair of Jupiter where Caesar sat renamed: Throne of St. Peter
Vestal Virgins renamed: Nuns
Pontifex Maximus (high priest of College of Senators) renamed: Supreme Pontiff of College of Cardinals
Pontiff or "high priest " of a pagan religious order (Zues, Apollo, Diana, Mars, Jupiter, Baal, Dionysys, Pythia etc) same name: Pontiff
A Pontiff (Latin: "pontifex") means bridge-builder or priest between man and the gods of the underworld.
The Roman Calender and Holy Days of the gods renamed: Calendar Holidays of the Saints
Voice of the gods speaking through Caesar: Ex-Cathedra: Voice of God speaking through Pope
Meeting of the Pontiffs (high priests) of the pagan religious orders renamed: Ecumenical Council of the Bishops
Legal act of creating a god (of a living or dead human, as was done to most of the Caesars) "Apotheosis of the Gods" renamed: Canonization of the Saints
A decree of Caesar (dictator for life): Pope's infalliable Dogma
Praying to a dead human god renamed: Praying to a saint
Vatican City is a landlocked state within the city of Rome, Italy. It is governed by the Bishop of Rome (called the Pope) are in fact clergymen.
It is the smallest sovereign state in the world.
Caesar Constintine began the "corporate takeover" by renaming all the old Roman offices, this evolution of name changing still occurs. Name changing allows a person to hide their tracks of origin.
Roman Empire offices & their modern names:
Roman Empire (Imperium Romanum) renamed: Roman Catholic Church
Curia (legal body of Senators) slight name change: Curia (legal body of Cardinals)
Roman Emperor renamed: Roman Pope (head of all church and state affairs)
Civil government matters of state: Extra-Ordinary affairs (matters of civil-state governments)
Religious orders matters: Church "ecclesiastical" matters
Roman College of Senators renamed: College of Cardinals
Magistrate of College of Senators renamed: Dean of College of Cardinals
Departments of the Roman Senatorial Curia renamed: Congregations
Political Ambassador renamed: Pro-Nuncio (highest civil ambassador sent to other governements, ie Wash.DC, London etc)
If a government has not signed a treaty with Rome which makes the Romans the head of the foreign country as certified in the Roman Code of Canon Law. This rebel nation which has no official ties has an ambassador called an Apostolic Delegate. The United States and the United Kingdom never allowed the Vatican to serve as their legal head until President Reagan quickly signed into law on January 10, 1984. This Treaty for the very first time in U.S. history recognized full diplomatic relations between the United States and the Vatican State.
In 1534 when the United Kingdom realized that the Treaty with the Vatican City-State made them subject to all the Popes rules they voided the treaty. Formal diplomatic relations between England and Vatican State were broken. Full diplomatic relations with the Pope's Vatican State were never restored for 448 years until 1982.
Roman Senators renamed: Cardinals
Roman Governors renamed: Archbishops
Roman Senator with no territory: Bishop (Code of Canon Law 376)
(Large) Roman Province renamed: Archdiocese
(Small) Roman Territory renamed: Diocese
Imperial Chair of Jupiter where Caesar sat renamed: Throne of St. Peter
Vestal Virgins renamed: Nuns
Pontifex Maximus (high priest of College of Senators) renamed: Supreme Pontiff of College of Cardinals
Pontiff or "high priest " of a pagan religious order (Zues, Apollo, Diana, Mars, Jupiter, Baal, Dionysys, Pythia etc) same name: Pontiff
A Pontiff (Latin: "pontifex") means bridge-builder or priest between man and the gods of the underworld.
The Roman Calender and Holy Days of the gods renamed: Calendar Holidays of the Saints
Voice of the gods speaking through Caesar: Ex-Cathedra: Voice of God speaking through Pope
Meeting of the Pontiffs (high priests) of the pagan religious orders renamed: Ecumenical Council of the Bishops
Legal act of creating a god (of a living or dead human, as was done to most of the Caesars) "Apotheosis of the Gods" renamed: Canonization of the Saints
A decree of Caesar (dictator for life): Pope's infalliable Dogma
Praying to a dead human god renamed: Praying to a saint
In the US the highest law of the land is the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in the Vatican State the Constitution is called the Code of Canon Law
Rom 1:18 ¶ For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in all unrighteousness;
false resurrection some 1500 years before Christ.
Gilgamesh
Vishnu
Nimrod
Osiris
Mars
Zeus
And then list off the respective Powers or Principalities or Fiefdoms that held to these beliefs and treats each of these different names above as though they are different people. Not so. They are al the same man, known by different names in their own native tongues. And then gives the idea that these were all separate and individual stories which allegedly happened in their own lands. Nothing could be further from the truth! It is the same story about the same man, with the name or title of the same man in many different tongues and languages! And to be honest, for the person or persons who made this movie to have "researched" this as well as they did to be so accurate on some aspects of this "Mystery Religion" of Osiris and then to miss this MOST OBVIOUS and EASY TO SEE TRUTH is really not all that likely or possible in my opinion.
Nimrod was known by this name amongst the Persians or Babylonians. After the confusion of tongues, and with now many languages, he was now known to the Egyptians as Osiris. To the Indians in India, he was known as Vishnu. To the Romans he was known as the great god Mars. To the Greeks, known as the god Zeus. Amongst the Nordic peoples in Central Europe, he was known as the god 'Woden.' All the same man, and all the same story. And it all revolved around the false resurrection of this god, which happened in Egypt.
In the same way today, Jesus Christ is known by many different names and titles throughout the earth. And I speak here of those who use the name along with the true account of the story of Jesus Christ. Does this mean that all of the Nations are telling accounts of their own individual story which happened in their own Nation? That each had their very own Savior? No! They are telling the same story of the same man, which happened in what was once known as Israel. In the same vein, all the different Powers, Principalities and Fiefdoms he speaks of having their own Savior account, goes back to the single story and account of the resurrection of Osiris.
Rome was an Empire who worshipped this false resurrection of Osiris. And all of the 'gods' associated with it. And the Roman Empire was never 'Christianized' or converted to Christ. And I can prove this 7 ways till Sunday. First of all, Empires cannot converted or receive salvation. It is only something which can happen on the individual level. Person by person.
The "Co-Opting of Christianity by Rome:"
The reason Pagan Rome 'Christianized' itself, was because there was one foe which they simply could never conquer. And this was the masses of people in its own Empire who were hearing about Christ and believing THAT story, rather than the false resurrection which Rome held to. And not consequently, the Roman Empire derived its very power from this false mystery religion and false resurrection of Nimrod or Osiris. As the Roman Caesar was the 'head' of these mystery religions, and as such could and did dictate the doctrine and dogma of its believers. e.g. Control of their lives in every way, shape or form. And because the Roman Caesar was 'lord' of this religion, he held the title of Pontifex Maximus, which means 'chief bridge-builder to the netherworld.' And as such demanded he be worshipped as god! Any who would not bow before Caesar and call him 'lord', would be imprisoned, tortured or put to death. They would be known as 'heretics' and as enemies of the Empire, and called subversive elements.
But they could not stop the spreading of this 'other resurrection' which was spreading like wild fire throughout the Empire, called 'Christianity' or 'the Way.' And for about 360 years tried to stomp it out by persecuting the Christians and putting them to death en mass by way of inquisition. Yet with each and every new wave of inquisitions, Christianity would then double, triple and quadruple. They would kill 300,000 Christians in a single swoop, and not just Christians, but any who dared not follow the false gods. And when they killed 300,000 people, 600,000 or 900,000 would then pop up in their place. They found themselves in a no win situation. As a matter of fact they found themselves in a losing battle where one day they would lose their Empire, and that the Christians would one day win, and rule this empire if for nothing else than their sheer numbers. The Roman Inquisitions all through the Empire was akin to throwing gas on an already hot and burning fire.
Pagan Romes Final Solution to the Christian Faith: Subvert it & Dominate it!
So what did they do to fix this situation? Nothing at first. For none of the Roman Caesars or Emperors had enough wisdom to handle the issue, yet. But then one day a man named Constantine was crowned Pontifex Maximus, or Caesar. And he had the solution and the wisdom to deal with this issue. At first he tried as his successors did to kill, pillage and burn the Christians. Until one day when it dawned upon him, and he "saw the darkness." e.g. A play of the words of seeing the Light..
He saw that it would advantageous to simply fake his own 'conversion.' And did so in 312AD. He had a 'vision' whereby he saw a giant cross in the sky, and , he now became a 'christian. ' It was here where Constantine started the co-opting of Christianity. He ordered the Empire to become 'christian' as he had become and 'saw the light.' e.g. Darkness.
The Renaming of the Roman Religious Orders; Corporate Takeover:
So what did the Roman Senate do? They complied of course, for what else can one do when ordered to do something by an egomaniacal madman who considered himself god? But in order to insure that the new 'converts' to 'christianity' would remain loyal to what he considered the 'true god' Osiris, and to ensure loyalty, the 'doctrine and dogma' of the scriptures would and could only be interpreted by who else? Yes, Pontifex Maximus or Caesar! They would water down the words of the scriptures and make them mean things never intended. They would change it to doublespeak. With this established now, a few more changes to the Roman Empire would need to be made to make this work. Their Orders of the Mystery Religions of Nimrod or Osiris would now be renamed. The Order of Osiris would now become known and renamed as 'The Secret Order of Jesus.' Thus, all of their Statues and Icons of Osiris would now become known as Jesus Christ. The False resurrection would now become center stage, but hidden. And they would continue exhorting the people to obey and worship these statues and icons without question or wavering. The Renaming of their False Gods:
The statues and idols of Semeramis, the 'queen of heaven' as she was known, would now be renamed to 'Mary.' The 'mother of god.' Remember Semeramis was the mother, and also the wife of Osiris. This same statue would remain and be worshipped still. But her name would be changed. Thus the Order of Semeramis, a military wing of the Roman Empire, of religious enforcement (similar to the Dominicans would later become) would now be renamed "The Secret Order of Mary."
Their great god Thor, Hercules & Jupiter (AKA-Shem, and all the same man and god in different languages) would now be renamed to become St. Peter. And thus the Order of Jupiter would now become the Secret Order of Peter. All of the statues you see in the Roman Catholic Church today are the very same statues and idols worshipped under the Roman Empire of their pagan gods. Only their names have been changed to protect the heresy. To protect the lie. To hide their origins. To confuse the people.
One thing would remain unchanged though. Their pompous regalia and religious garb would stay for the most part the same as before. The Caesar would still wear 'Dagons Mitre' and the 'Triple Crown' as before during religious ceremonies. He would still clothe himself in the White & Scarlet arrogant pomp we see still to this day! The Roman Senators, now known as "Roman Cardinals" would still war their ceremonial garb they used to wear at the religious festivals of the 'gods;' Only now they would wear them always. Their Priests would still give "the mass" as they did to the Pagan Roman Churches, but with all of the new names for the old pagan gods and false resurrection of Osiris. The Renaming of the Roman Government Offices & their New "Christian" Names:
They would need to change the names of their government offices and agencies as well, in order to hide the origins of their 'christianity.' The Roman Senate would now be renamed to become the 'Roman Curia.' The Roman Emperor would be renamed to become 'the Pope.' What was known as the office of 'Roman Office of Religious Ecclesiastical matters' would now be called "Church Ecclesiastical matters.' The Roman College of Senators would now be renamed to become "The College of Cardinals." The Throne of Jupiter which Caesar sat upon would now become known as the "Throne of St. Peter" But it is the very same throne which the Caesars sat upon! heres a list of this name changing and re-ordering of the Roman Empire government offices and agencies into their new 'christian names'first remember the matrix the whole world is enslaved by its roman papal deception
Morpheus : The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work... when you go to church... when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Neo : What truth?
Morpheus : That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into bondage. Into a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch. A prison for your mind.
Morpheus : I'm trying to free your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it.: Roman Senators renamed: Cardinals
Roman Governors renamed: Archbishops
Roman Senator with no territory: Bishop (Code of Canon Law 376)
(Large) Roman Province renamed: Archdiocese
(Small) Roman Territory renamed: Diocese
Imperial Chair of Jupiter where Caesar sat renamed: Throne of St. Peter
Vestal Virgins renamed: Nuns
Pontifex Maximus (high priest of College of Senators) renamed: Supreme Pontiff of College of Cardinals
Pontiff or "high priest " of a pagan religious order (Zues, Apollo, Diana, Mars, Jupiter, Baal, Dionysys, Pythia etc) same name: Pontiff
A Pontiff (Latin: "pontifex") means bridge-builder or priest between man and the gods of the underworld.
The Roman Calender and Holy Days of the gods renamed: Calendar Holidays of the Saints
Voice of the gods speaking through Caesar: Ex-Cathedra: Voice of God speaking through Pope
Meeting of the Pontiffs (high priests) of the pagan religious orders renamed: Ecumenical Council of the Bishops
Legal act of creating a god (of a living or dead human, as was done to most of the Caesars) "Apotheosis of the Gods" renamed: Canonization of the Saints
A decree of Caesar (dictator for life): Pope's infalliable Dogma
Praying to a dead human god renamed: Praying to a saint
It's time for Catholics to wake up and see the Truth
1 John 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. 19They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
Upside Down Cross Symbolizes mockery and rejection of Jesus. Necklaces are worn by many overt Satanists. |
Photographed on his 13 foot high throne on the holiest site of all, the Temple Mount....'il Papa' - the Pope, one of the "many Antichrists", one of Satan's greatest victories, committing yet another abomination of desolation... the Satanic deception of this church is now practically complete.
On December 13, 2000, the official Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, under the heading, “All are called to build God’s kingdom”, published the Pope’s words from his General Audience of December 6th. The Pontiff declared,“Those who have chosen the way of the Gospel Beatitudes and live as ‘the poor in spirit’, detached from material goods, in order to raise up the lowly of the earth from the dust of their humiliation, will enter the kingdom of God….Those who lovingly bear the sufferings of life will enter the kingdom…All the just of the earth, including those who do not know Christ and his Church, who, under the influence of grace, seek God with a sincere heart, are thus called to build the kingdom of God by working with the Lord, who is its first and decisive builder.”
These beguiling words are a Satanic LIE! This is NOT what the Bible says. Each expression suggests salvation in a way that is alien to Scripture. It is not by choosing “the way of the Gospel Beatitudes” that one enters the kingdom of God, but rather faith in ‘The Way’, Jesus Christ and in His finished work on the Cross; “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.” It is not by “lovingly bear[ing] the sufferings of life” that we enter into the kingdom, but by Christ “bearing” our sins and “suffering” in our stead. It is nonsense to imply that a man who does not know Christ can be a part of the kingdom of God. I am the Good Shepherd and know My sheep, and am known of mine (John 10:14).
John 14:6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
The papal pronouncement can only be understood in the light of the Pontiff’s continued plans for World Government. His presupposition is that the kingdom of God already exists in the Roman Catholic Church. This is consistent with the his new Catechism, “…The [Roman Catholic] Church is the seed and beginning of this kingdom." Satan's kingdom.
The heart-wrenching thought here is that this evil man is in the process of taking 800 million Catholics to hell with him.
The Papal throne to shift from Rome to Jerusalem
What does Islam and the Papal religion have in common? More than you probably are aware of.They both see the Holy Land as occupied by Zionists. Non of them have Jerusalem as the present center of their religion. And they both need to shift their throne of authority to Jerusalem to overcome the Jews.
Islam lack a throne. Muslims basically bows down to worship in front of an empty throne. The Pope has a throne. And the Catholics visiting the Vatican either bow down to kiss the ring of the Fisherman, or fall down on their face and worship him.
Islam has no central leader who can reunite them. Since that Pope already has accepted that Islam is a part of God`s plan to save mankind, Islam will be able to accept the Pope, as the Prince of Peace. Shiite and Sunni Muslims will for the first time stand united and gathered in front of the new universal Papal throne in the Dome of The Rock in Jerusalem.
But the Papal throne must face southwards inside the Dome of the Rock. Towards Mecca. Otherwise, the Muslims will not bow down towards the throne.
What is the Papal throne?
The Papal throne is nothing new to the Roman Church. It was last seen in 1978 with Papa Luciani. Now it back again used by the present Pontiff. Pope John Paul opted not to use a throne and so it sat in storage and then in the Lateran Palace museum until last December of 2006 when it was brought back into papal use. In the Catholic religion the Pope is infallible when he sits on his Papal throne or chair in questions about moral and true understanding of the scripture.
How will the Papal throne be moved from Rome to Jerusalem?
What do you think the Vatican and Islam are talking about when they met for interfaith dialogue?
They have already agreed on the most important issues:
1. The Holy land is occupied by Zionists and need to be liberated.
2. Both Roman Catholicism and Islam is included in Gods plan of saving mankind, since both represent the children of God of Abraham.
3. All religions expresses some truths about God, and needs to be included to make an fulfilled picture of the creator.
4. Jesus is the son of Mary.
5. World peace will first flow out from Jerusalem when the three present main religions are able to live in peace, and come together as one voice and offer God interfaith prayers.
How can Muslim pray in any other direction than Mecca?
Thats a good question. Let me first say that there are still certain issues the two main religions have not entered into agreement about. Thats why they keep on their dialogue .
But the challenges linked to your question has been solved. In 2006, the Pope entered into the Blue Mosque in Istanbul. There he joined his Muslim brethren in prayer. Some Catholics say the Pontiff only mediated, but thats beside my point. The head of the Vatican religion prayed or meditated in the direction of Mecca, with Muslims who prayed in the name of Allah.
When the Papal throne is moved to Jerusalem, the Muslim will pray in the direction of both the Papal throne and Mecca. Than there should be no longer any problems for Muslims and Catholics to pray together.
And where will they pray together?
And where will they pray together?
Do you think The Pope in May entered the Temple Mount to go for a stroll to the watch the beautiful view? It was both a display of new Catholic-Muslim unity, and a chance to debate the last practical solutions before a final agreement can be reached.
Questions like this still has to be answered and agreed up on:
How do we best move to renovate the Dome of The Rock without upsetting the Government of Israel?
Where are the Mullas and were are the Cardinals going to stand during the prayer service?
What shall be the level of the Papal throne? Shall it stand on the floor, or should it be elevated?
And in which name will they pray together?
They will probably officially pray to Allah in the name of «Jesus son of Mary». For the sake of World peace, both sides will be willing to compromise. In their view there is only one God, and how you pronounce his name is not so important. In specially now, when peace and universal brotherhood is at stake. Even the Iranian President Ahmadinejad believe in the return of Jesus. He will return and tell Christians and Jews to tell them to turn towards Allah.
Thats the easiest question to answer. Just like in the day of Elijah. He will call down fire from Heaven
Revelation: 13:13
«And he performed great and miraculous signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to earth in full view of men».
Even Muslims understands who is the boss
when fire comes down from Heaven. Than its all game, set and match. The
final antichrist has now come to Jerusalem to enter into God`s temple.
The next Pope might be this powerful man in whose footsteps will
follow miracles and signs. People who can call down fire from Heaven,
will exalt them self and the followers of signs and wonders will exalt
him.
2 Thessalonians 2:4
«He will oppose and will exalt himself
over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets
himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God».ANTI:
- to stand in place of
- a subtle imposter
- wolf in sheep's clothing
- not a violent opposer
- a gentle confuser
The Roman Catholic church has always 'claimed' to be walking "with" Christ. Just as Judas "kissed" Christ, so has Rome "kissed" His Truth. They "softly and gently" send their wolves forward wearing the clothing of a little lamb so as to gentle draw the masses away from Christ. They betray Christ as soft as the kiss of JUDAS!
Arnulf Bishop of Orleans (Roman Catholic)
"deplored the roman popes as "monsters of guilt" and declared in a council called by the King of France in 991ad that the pontiff, clad in purple and gold, was, "Antichrist, sitting in the temple of God, and showing himself as God" -Phillip Schaff, History of the Christian church, 8 vols., reprint of the 3d (1910)ed. (Grand Rapids Mich.: Wm. B Eerdmans Publishing Co., n.d.)
Eberhard II, archbishop of Salzburg (Roman Catholic)
"stated at a synod of bishops held at Regensburg in 1240 (some scholars say 1241) that the people of his day were "accustomed" to calling the pope antichrist." -LeRoy Edwin Froom, The Prophetic Faith of our Fathers, 4 vols. (Wash DC: Review and Herald publishing assc, 1950-1954)
John Wycliffe
"When the western church was divided for about 40 years between two rival popes, one in Rome and the other in Avigon, France, each pope called the other pope antichrist - and John Wycliffe is reputed to have regarded them as both being right: "two halves of Antichrist, making up the perfect Man of Sin between them." -Ibid
Martin Luther (Lutheran)
"We here are of the conviction that the papacy is the seat of the true and real Antichrist...personally I declare that I owe the Pope no other obedience than that to Antichrist." (Aug. 18, 1520) Taken from The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, Vol. 2., pg. 121 by Froom. (In response to a papal bull [official decree]): "I despise and attack it, as impious, false... It is Christ Himself who is condemned therein... I rejoice in having to bear such ills for the best of causes. Already I feel greater liberty in my heart; for at last I know that the pope is antichrist, and that his throne is that of Satan himself." --D'Aubigné, b.6, ch. 9.
"deplored the roman popes as "monsters of guilt" and declared in a council called by the King of France in 991ad that the pontiff, clad in purple and gold, was, "Antichrist, sitting in the temple of God, and showing himself as God" -Phillip Schaff, History of the Christian church, 8 vols., reprint of the 3d (1910)ed. (Grand Rapids Mich.: Wm. B Eerdmans Publishing Co., n.d.)
Eberhard II, archbishop of Salzburg (Roman Catholic)
"stated at a synod of bishops held at Regensburg in 1240 (some scholars say 1241) that the people of his day were "accustomed" to calling the pope antichrist." -LeRoy Edwin Froom, The Prophetic Faith of our Fathers, 4 vols. (Wash DC: Review and Herald publishing assc, 1950-1954)
John Wycliffe
"When the western church was divided for about 40 years between two rival popes, one in Rome and the other in Avigon, France, each pope called the other pope antichrist - and John Wycliffe is reputed to have regarded them as both being right: "two halves of Antichrist, making up the perfect Man of Sin between them." -Ibid
Martin Luther (Lutheran)
"We here are of the conviction that the papacy is the seat of the true and real Antichrist...personally I declare that I owe the Pope no other obedience than that to Antichrist." (Aug. 18, 1520) Taken from The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, Vol. 2., pg. 121 by Froom. (In response to a papal bull [official decree]): "I despise and attack it, as impious, false... It is Christ Himself who is condemned therein... I rejoice in having to bear such ills for the best of causes. Already I feel greater liberty in my heart; for at last I know that the pope is antichrist, and that his throne is that of Satan himself." --D'Aubigné, b.6, ch. 9.
Cotton Mather (Congregational Theologian)
"The oracles of God foretold the rising of an Antichrist in the Christian Church: and in the Pope of Rome, all the characteristics of that Antichrist are so marvelously answered that if any who read the Scriptures do not see it, there is a marvelous blindness upon them." Taken from The Fall of Babylon by Cotton Mather in Froom's book, The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, Vol. 3, pg. 113.
John Wesley (Methodist)
Speaking of the Papacy he said, "He is in an emphatical sense, the Man of Sin, as he increases all manner of sin above measure. And he is, too, properly styled the Son of Perdition, as he has caused the death of numberless multitudes, both of his opposers and followers... He it is...that exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped...claiming the highest power, and highest honour...claiming the prerogatives which belong to God alone." Taken from Antichrist and His Ten Kingdoms by John Wesley, pg. 110.
Ellen G. White: Seven Day Adventists
"This compromise between paganism and Christianity resulted in the development of "the man of sin" foretold in prophecy as opposing and exalting himself above God. That gigantic system of false religion is a masterpiece of Satan's power--a monument of his efforts to seat himself upon the throne to rule the earth according to his will.
"The oracles of God foretold the rising of an Antichrist in the Christian Church: and in the Pope of Rome, all the characteristics of that Antichrist are so marvelously answered that if any who read the Scriptures do not see it, there is a marvelous blindness upon them." Taken from The Fall of Babylon by Cotton Mather in Froom's book, The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, Vol. 3, pg. 113.
John Wesley (Methodist)
Speaking of the Papacy he said, "He is in an emphatical sense, the Man of Sin, as he increases all manner of sin above measure. And he is, too, properly styled the Son of Perdition, as he has caused the death of numberless multitudes, both of his opposers and followers... He it is...that exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped...claiming the highest power, and highest honour...claiming the prerogatives which belong to God alone." Taken from Antichrist and His Ten Kingdoms by John Wesley, pg. 110.
Ellen G. White: Seven Day Adventists
"This compromise between paganism and Christianity resulted in the development of "the man of sin" foretold in prophecy as opposing and exalting himself above God. That gigantic system of false religion is a masterpiece of Satan's power--a monument of his efforts to seat himself upon the throne to rule the earth according to his will.
Thomas Cranmer (Anglican)
"Whereof it followeth Rome to be the seat of antichrist, and the pope to be very antichrist himself. I could prove the same by many other scriptures, old writers, and strong reasons." (Referring to prophecies in Revelation and Daniel.) Taken from Works by Cranmer, Vol. 1, pp. 6-7.
Roger Williams (First Baptist Pastor in America)"Whereof it followeth Rome to be the seat of antichrist, and the pope to be very antichrist himself. I could prove the same by many other scriptures, old writers, and strong reasons." (Referring to prophecies in Revelation and Daniel.) Taken from Works by Cranmer, Vol. 1, pp. 6-7.
He spoke of the Pope as "the pretended Vicar of Christ on earth, who sits as God over the Temple of God, exalting himself not only above all that is called God, but over the souls and consciences of all his vassals, yea over the Spirit of Christ, over the Holy Spirit, yea, and God himself...speaking against the God of heaven, thinking to change times and laws; but he is the son of perdition (II Thess. 2)." Taken from The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers by Froom, Vol. 3, pg. 52.
1689 London Baptist
Confession
Chapter 26: Of
the
Church. The Lord Jesus Christ is the Head of the church,
in whom, by the appointment of the Father, all power for the calling,
institution, order or government of the church, is invested in a supreme and
sovereign manner; neither can the Pope of Rome in any sense be head thereof, but
is that antichrist, that man of sin, and son of perdition, that exalteth himself
in the church against Christ, and all that is called God; whom the Lord shall
destroy with the brightness of his coming. ( Colossians 1:18; Matthew 28:18-20; Ephesians 4:11, 12;
2 Thessalonians 2:2-9 )
John Knox (Scotch Presbyterian)
Knox wrote to abolish "that tyranny which the pope himself has for so many ages exercised over the church" and that the pope should be recognized as "the very antichrist, and son of perdition, of whom Paul speaks." Taken from The Zurich Letters, pg. 199 by John Knox.
Knox wrote to abolish "that tyranny which the pope himself has for so many ages exercised over the church" and that the pope should be recognized as "the very antichrist, and son of perdition, of whom Paul speaks." Taken from The Zurich Letters, pg. 199 by John Knox.
John Calvin (Presbyterian)
"Some persons think us too severe and censorious when we call the Roman pontiff Antichrist. But those who are of this opinion do not consider that they bring the same charge of presumption against Paul himself, after whom we speak and whose language we adopt... I shall briefly show that (Paul's words in II Thess. 2) are not capable of any other interpretation than that which applies them to the Papacy." Taken from Institutes by John Calvin.
Presbyterian Church (Year 2000)
The following Resolution was unanimously passed by the South Atlantic Presbytery of the Bible Presbyterian Church meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina, March 25, 2000.
The Resolution is as follows-
"Some persons think us too severe and censorious when we call the Roman pontiff Antichrist. But those who are of this opinion do not consider that they bring the same charge of presumption against Paul himself, after whom we speak and whose language we adopt... I shall briefly show that (Paul's words in II Thess. 2) are not capable of any other interpretation than that which applies them to the Papacy." Taken from Institutes by John Calvin.
Presbyterian Church (Year 2000)
The following Resolution was unanimously passed by the South Atlantic Presbytery of the Bible Presbyterian Church meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina, March 25, 2000.
The Resolution is as follows-
THE THREAT OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE 21ST CENTURY
Whereas: The mass media has captivated the world with the activities of Pope John Paul II during his visit to the Holy Land in March 2000; and Whereas: The Vatican and the Lutheran World Federation have signed, in October, 1999 a joint declaration of accord on the doctrine of justification (only the synods of Wisconsin and Missouri dissented); and Whereas: In the middle of February, 200, PLO chairman Yasser Arafat met with Pope John Paul II at the vatican to sign an agreement regarding the future of Jerusalem that warned Israel against any unilateral decision affecting Jerusalem; and Whereas: Bob Jones University has been unjustly slandered for anti-catholic bias by Senators McCain, Torricelli, Hollings and the liberal mass media; and Whereas: The House of Representatives of the U.S. Congress has just appointed a Roman Catholic priest as its chaplain for the first time, March 23, 2000; and Whereas: Pope John Paul II has declared the year 2000 a "Great Jubilee Year" for Roman Catholics that establishes the restoration of indulgences, THE VERY ISSUE THAT PROMPTED MARTIN LUTHER TO DRAFT THE 95 THESES IN OCTOBER OF 1517: papal spokesman Timothy Shugrue states, "The indulgence is one of the spiritual privleges extended during Jubilee. It is a way of applying the merits of the good deeds of the saints and the Virgin Mary and CHrist Himself to the rest of us."; Therefore: The South Atlantic Presbytery of the Bible Presbyterian Church, at its spring meeting in the Bible Presbyterian Church of Charlotte, N.C., March 25, 2000, resolves and warns the Roman Catholic Church, Mystery, Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots and abominations of the earth (Rev 17:5) constitutes the greatest threat to fundamental Christianity in the 21st century! The Roman Catholic Church has long since forsaken the Bible alone, Grace alone, faith alone, and Christ alone. There should be no confraternity with this apostate church in ministerial associations, community easter sunrise services, Thanksgiving services, mass evangelism or common social endeavors. We admonish devout believers to lovingly and firmly win Roman Catholics to Christ and urge new converts to obey Rev. 18:4, "And I heard a another voice from heaven, saying, come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sin, and that ye recieve not her plagues." |
Before the Reformation, this is
what most Preachers taught regarding Antichrist
Date | Name | Reference | Interpretation |
c.
1310
|
Dante Alighieri | Rev. 17 Harlot | Roman Church |
c. 1331
|
Michael of Cesena | Rev. 17 Harlot Antichrist |
Roman Church Pope |
c. 1345
|
Johannes de Rupescissa | Antichrist Rev. 17 Babylon Rev. 17 Harlot |
Pope Roman church Roman church |
c. 1350
|
Francesco Petrarch | Rev. 17 Harlot | Papal Court |
c. 1367
|
John Milicz | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Man of Sin |
Papacy Papacy Papacy |
c. 1379
|
John Wycliffe | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 17 Harlot |
Pope Papacy Popes Papacy Papacy |
c. 1388
|
Matthias of Janow | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Hierarchy Fallen Church Present Church Papacy Hierarchy Popes |
c. 1389
|
R. Wimbledon | Abomination of Desolation | Papacy |
c. 1390
|
John Purvey | Antichrist Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 13 666 Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Pope Papacy Hierarchy Pope Papacy Papacy |
c. 1393
|
Walter Brute | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Little Horn Man of Sin |
Papacy Bishop of Rome Rome Papacy |
c. 1412
|
John Huss | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Pope Papacy Rome Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
c. 1497
|
Girolamo Savonarola | Antichrist Man of Sin Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Pope Papacy Papacy Papacy |
During the Reformation...
Date | Name | Reference | Interpretation |
1522
|
Martin Luther | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 2nd Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1543
|
Philipp Melanchthon | Antichrist Man of Sin Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1545
|
Andreas Osiander | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papal Traditions Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1554
|
Nicolaus von Amsdorf | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papal Traditions Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1558
|
Johann Funck | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1560
|
Virgil Solis | Antichrist Little Horn Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1570
|
Georg Nigrinus | Antichrist Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast |
Pope,
Turk Papacy Pagan Rome Papal Rome |
1572
|
David Chytraeus | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Roman Empire Papacy |
1530
|
Johann Oecolampadius | Antichrist Little Horn |
Papacy Papacy |
1557
|
Heinrich Bullinger | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Pagan Rome Papal Rome Roman Church Papacy |
1550
|
William Tyndale | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1545
|
George Joys | Antichrist Little Horn |
Papacy Papacy |
1554
|
Nicholas Ridley | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon Rev. 17 Beast |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1553
|
Hugh Latimer | Antichrist | Papacy |
1582
|
Thomas Cranmer | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1550
|
John Bale | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon Rev. 17 Beast |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Prelates Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1562
|
John Jewel | Antichrist Abomination of Desolation Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon Rev. 17 Beast |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Rome |
1587
|
John Foxe | Antichrist Man of Sin |
Bishop of
Rome Bishop of Rome |
1563
|
Anglican Formulas | Antichrist | Papacy |
1547
|
John Knox | Antichrist Little Horn |
Church of
Rome Papacy |
1593
|
John Napier | Antichrist Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon Rev. 17 Beast |
Pope Papacy Latin Empire Papacy Papacy Papacy Latin Empire |
1614
|
Thomas Brightman | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Pope Papacy Papacy Early Papacy Later Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1618
|
David Pareus | Antichrist Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Beast |
Pope &
Turk Papacy Papacy Papacy Empire |
After the Reformation...
Date
|
Name
|
Reference
|
Interpretation
|
1600 | James I of England | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1603 | George Downham | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1604 | George Pacard | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Rome Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1607 | Hugh Broughton | Little Horn | Antiochus |
1612 | Andress Holwig | Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast |
Papacy is also
Antichrist Papacy |
1618 | Matthias Hoe | Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy is
Antichrist Imperial Rome Papal Rome Papacy |
1618 | Daniel Cramer | Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Pagan Rome Papal Rome Papacy |
1631 | Joseph Mede | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Civil Rome Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1643 | Johannes Gerhard | Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Civil Rome Papal Rome Papacy Papacy |
1654 | Thomas Goodwin | Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast |
Papacy Papacy Protestant Image |
1655 | John Tillinghast | Antichrist Little Horn Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1664 | Henry More | Antichrist Little Horn |
Papacy Papacy |
1670 | William Sherwin | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1681 | Johann H. Alsted | Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot |
Papacy is Antichrist, Little
Horn Imperial Rome Papal Rome Papacy |
1684 | Thomas Beverley | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1685 | Jacques Phillipot | Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy also
Antichrist Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1687 | Pierre Jurieu | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Eccl. Emp. Papacy |
1689 | Drue Cressener | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Hierarchy Papacy |
1699 | "Mysteries ... Finished" | Antichrist | Papacy |
1700 | William Lowth | Antichrist Little Horn |
Papacy Papacy |
1701 | Johannes Cocceius | Antichrist Little Horn Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Hierarchy Papacy |
1701 | Robert Fleming, Jr. | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1702 | Georg her. Giblehr | Antichrist Little Horn |
Papacy Papacy |
1703 | Daniel Whitby | Man of Sin Rev. 17 Babylon |
Roman Church is
Antichrist Papacy |
1706 | William Whiston | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1712 | Heinrich Horch | Antichrist Little Horn Rev. 13 1st Beast |
Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1720 | Charles Daubux | Rev. 13 1st
Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Civil
Rome Eccl Rome Papacy Papacy |
1727 | Sir Isaac Newton | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy W. Rome Greek Empire Papacy Latin Kingdom |
1729 | Th. Crinsox de Bionens | Antichrist Little Horn Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Roman Empire Popes Papacy |
1735 | Thomas Pyle | Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy also Little
Horn Papacy Papacy |
1740 | Johann Aal. Bengel | Antichrist Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Jesuitism Papacy Papacy |
1743 | Berienberg Bible | Antichrist | Papacy |
1745 | John Willison | Antichrist Little Horn |
Papacy Papacy |
1754 | Thomas Newton | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy W. Rome Papacy Papacy Roman Clergy Papacy |
1758 | John Gill | Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast |
Papacy
Papacy also AntichristPapacy |
1764 | John Wesley | Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy also
Antichrist Papacy East Empire Papal Rome Papacy |
1768 | Johann Ph. Petri | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast |
Papacy Turks Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1787 | R. M. | Antichrist | Papacy |
1787 | Hans Wood | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy East Empire Papacy Papacy |
1793 | James Becheno | Antichrist Little Horn Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Louis XIV Papacy |
1794 | Joseph Priestly | Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1795 | George Bell | Antichrist Little Horn |
Papacy Papacy |
1796 | Christian G. Thube | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1797 | David Simpson | Antichrist Little Horn |
Papacy Papacy |
1798 | Edward King | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1798 | Joseph Galloway | Rev. 13 1st
Beast Rev. 13 2nd Peast Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy France Papacy |
1798 | Richard Valpy | Antichrist Little Horn Man of Sin Rev. 13 1st Beast Rev. 17 Harlot Rev. 17 Babylon |
Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy Papacy |
1800 | Jean G. de la Flechers | Antichrist Little Horn |
Papacy Papacy |
According to the Roman
Catholic church, ALL of these men are mis-interpreting prophecy?
No comments:
Post a Comment