TRUTH BE TOLD

TRUTH BE TOLD
WORLD NEWS EVERY DAY

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

pope is evil anitchrist



Over the last few weeks some have asked who I think the next Pope would be. I have stated all along that I had three or four favorites judging by how evil this church needs to get next if they hope to enforce their mark. Out of those favorites I saw two that stand out rather boldly. Cardinal Francis Arinze, a black man who declared openly Christ is not needed to gain Heaven. And Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger who heads the office of Inquisition that Pope John Paul II re-instated back in February of 1991, who also declared Christ not needed. I have said repeatedly that if there were only these two to choose from, I am positive Ratzinger would get the vote. As some of you that frequent the POGM Chat rooms know, I started the research a few days before Ratzinger was elected because I felt he was going to get to the job. Why? He was a Nazi soldier as well as one of Hitler’s youth. You do the math. To have a man with such an evil past as his, one can only assume he is Rome’s favourite. A babe in Christ that studies prophecy could have figured this one out. Looking to John Paul II and the fact he sold cyanide to the Nazi’s for killing Jews, one can see it’s a good bet they would elect Ratzinger all along. In fact, there were many articles in the media beforehand proclaiming him the favorite to win. And we all thought it was a SECRET conclave eh?
With that said… I would like to share an article I was planning on sharing even before Ratzinger was elected. I figured if he wasn’t elected, he is still the dean of Cardinals and worthy of exposing. The fact he was elected pope makes it all more evident that Rome is home to many demons. For them to elect a man like this says volumes about their character. And some of you thought allowing Cardinal Law to say a mass for John Paul II’s corpse was a bad thing? Bernard Law, a man that allowed scores of children to be raped on a regular basis, who was then cast out of office in the USA only to be promoted in the Vatican. That act alone made many realize just how evil Rome truly is. They simply don’t care what their own flock thinks of them anymore. And to drive that fact home, they elect Ratzinger? This is going to make is far easier to convince the Catholics it’s time to come out of Babylon now.
The article is as follows…
The Sunday Times - World  reported on April 17, 2005 the following article.
Papal hopeful is a former Hitler Youth
 Justin Sparks, Munich, John Follain and Christopher Morgan, Rome
UNDERSTAND.. this article is all about Ratzinger and it was published 2 days before his election as pope.
THE wartime past of a leading German contender to succeed John Paul II may return to haunt him as cardinals begin voting in the Sistine Chapel tomorrow to choose a new leader for 1 billion Catholics.
Stopping right there for a moment for the obvious comment. The Nazi war crimes of other popes never seemed to prevent them from gaining the papal chair, why start now? The articles and facts I display online about the popes regarding this fact confirms that easily. Most of the data was known BEFORE they became pope. Take for example John Paul II. Did his employment as a Cyanide salesman for the Nazi’s prevent him from becoming Pope? No! Not at all! In fact he became the most globally loved pope last I checked. An evil generation loves and evil leader. Did this generation not learn anything from Clinton? This is why we see Ratzinger as pope now. The people are ready for it, and Satan knows it.
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, whose strong defence of Catholic orthodoxy has earned him a variety of sobriquets — (nick names) including “the enforcer”, “the panzer (German tank) cardinal” and “God’s rottweiler” — is expected to poll around 40 votes in the first ballot as conservatives rally behind him.
Although far short of the requisite two-thirds majority of the 115 votes, this would almost certainly give Ratzinger, 78 yesterday, an early lead in the voting. Liberals have yet to settle on a rival candidate who could come close to his tally.
Unknown to many members of the church, however, Ratzinger’s past includes brief membership of the Hitler Youth movement and wartime service with a German army anti- aircraft unit.
Hitler youth?  Were these not the children that were brainwashed in such a way that they were turning their own parents in to be killed by the Nazi’s? And he’s now pope? Judging by the Vatican’s past… this is par for the course. I guess… Plus, history declares he was a German soldier as well? Before dealing with rebuttals on that fact, understand you don’t man an ant-aircraft unit as a youth, though the Vatican will no doubt lie and say otherwise.
Although there is no suggestion that he was involved in any atrocities, his service may be contrasted by opponents with the attitude of John Paul II, who took part in anti-Nazi theatre performances in his native Poland and in 1986 became the first pope to visit Rome’s synagogue.
Anti Nazi theatre? Isn’t this always the case with Rome. There is evidence supporting the fact that John Paul II helped the Nazi’s kill people from all walks of life, and here the Vatican claims he was against the Nazi’s? So.. does anyone believe them when they say Ratzinger wasn’t involved in any atrocities? This Vatican is well known for their lies. Need I mention how many eons they lied about molesting their parish youth?
…The son of a rural Bavarian police officer, Ratzinger was six when Hitler came to power in 1933. His father, also called Joseph, was an anti-Nazi whose attempts to rein in Hitler’s Brown Shirts forced the family to move home several times.
In 1937 Ratzinger’s father retired and the family moved to Traunstein, a staunchly Catholic town in Bavaria close to the Führer’s mountain retreat in Berchtesgaden. He joined the Hitler Youth aged 14, shortly after membership was made compulsory in 1941.
He quickly won a dispensation on account of his training at a seminary. “Ratzinger was only briefly a member of the Hitler Youth and not an enthusiastic one,” concluded John Allen, his biographer.
Ok.. one minute they say that there is “no suggestion of Ratzinger being involved in atrocities..” The next they sound so confident that he was not an enthusiastic youth for Hitler. Confused? Of course you are. This is all Rome knows how to do. They mix it up so much that both sides of the fence can be embraced without seeming to be on either side.
Two years later Ratzinger was enrolled in an anti-aircraft unit that protected a BMW factory making aircraft engines. The workforce included slaves from Dachau concentration camp.
Slaves from concentration camps? First of all, this confirms he went beyond Hitler’s youth to actually becoming a Nazi soldier for Hitler. This also alludes to the fact he WAS involved in atrocities. I mean come on.. think about it. He’s a Nazi soldier. His buddies are all Nazi soldiers. Do you think maybe peer pressure or simple showing off would have lead to some atrocities with those slaves from the concentration camps that worked so closely with him in those factories? Do I need to spell it out here? They are lying in this article.
Ratzinger has insisted he never took part in combat or fired a shot — adding that his gun was not even loaded — because of a badly infected finger. He was sent to Hungary, where he set up tank traps and saw Jews being herded to death camps. He deserted in April 1944 and spent a few weeks in a prisoner of war camp.
A badly infected finger prevented him from firing an UNLOADED gun? Which is it? The gun was unloaded? Or your finger was infected? Why would he mention an infected finger if the gun was already unloaded? Or vise versa? Too many “likely stories” would make even the most uneducated rookie in detective work shout out, HE’S HIDING SOMETHING HERE! I mean come on already! An infected finger!? That’s almost as laughable as an unloaded NAZI anti-aircraft gun. The gun is placed in position to defend a crucial war time installation, a factory, a WAR TIME NAZI RUN factory no less. It’s a strategic piece of equipment in assuring the operation of the plant goes on without hindrance, and Ratzinger wants us to believe the Nazi’s not only had this greatly needed, and strategic defense weapon UNLOADED? He also wants us to believe the Nazi’s had no problem with having someone manning the gun that couldn’t even fire it in the event the plant was attacked because his finger was infected? Does that sound like a normal wartime procedure to you? Wouldn’t you rather have the guns LOADED and the soldiers healthy enough to pull the triggers? Is this ridiculous or what? Lies can be so transparent sometimes!
He has since said that although he was opposed to the Nazi regime, any open resistance would have been futile — comments echoed this weekend by his elder brother Georg, a retired priest ordained along with the cardinal in 1951.
“Resistance was truly impossible,” Georg Ratzinger said. “Before we were conscripted, one of our teachers said we should fight and become heroic Nazis and another told us not to worry as only one soldier in a thousand was killed. But neither of us ever used a rifle against the enemy.”
Do you believe them? I don’t either. In fact, the article goes on to some that didn't’ believe that story either!
Some locals in Traunstein, like Elizabeth Lohner, 84, whose brother-in-law was sent to Dachau as a conscientious objector, dismiss such suggestions. “It was possible to resist, and those people set an example for others,” she said. “The Ratzingers were young and had made a different choice.”
AMEN! There are MANY stories from that era that prove Ratzinger and his brother were able to resist. But will that matter since he has already been crowned Lord god pope, or another god on earth as Vatican documentation calls him now? Time will tell. Rest assured, after this election many will clamour to his side with ear to ear grins in the hopes of his obvious blessings irregardless of how evil this man has proven to be already. Keep in mind, this is the Cardinal that John Paul II had head up the office of Inquisition when it was re-opened in 1991. Truth is, he was still the controlling cardinal of that office as well as the DEAN of cardinals when he was elected pope. He’s gotten this far with his evil past, why would another step matter? This is why it became obvious to so many he was to be pope. That and the fact he’s the one that controlled the voting process in the first place.
Continuing in the article, they go on to further confirm it was a lie that it was impossible to resist…
In 1937 another family a few hundred yourds away in Traunstein hid Hans Braxenthaler, a local resistance fighter. SS troops repeatedly searched homes in the area looking for the fugitive and his fellow conspirators.
“When he was betrayed and the Nazis came for him, Braxenthaler shot himself because he knew he couldn’t escape,” said Frieda Meyer, 82, Ratzinger’s neighbour and childhood friend. “Even though they had tortured him in Dachau concentration camp he refused to give up his resistance efforts.”
…As one western cardinal who was in two minds about him put it: “He would probably be a great pope, but I have no idea how I would explain his election back home.”
One liberal theologian,when asked what he thought of a Ratzinger papacy, was more direct: “It fills me with horror.”
 So.. what will they do? Time will tell.
Now, one more thing is needed to be mentioned here. As I mentioned in previous Truth Provided broadcasts, Germany is to play a very strategic role in creating and solidifying the one world government. So a Pope from Germany was actually a no-brainer. Just like a Pope from Poland during their Solidarity movement was predictable. Germany’s pivotal role became apparent after John Paul Il gathered forces with Ronald Reagan to topple the iron curtain. This is why both men were shot by would be assassins that year. Yes, I know the media has a completely different story on the shootings, but since when do we believe anything the media has to say anyway? I mean they’re still saying a 767 aircraft that is 45 feet high, 125 feet wide and about 144 feet long left a 16 foot hole in the Pentagon! Not only that, it left absolutely no debris, no dead bodies, and caused absolutely no damage to the front lawn of the Pentagon it supposedly bounced off of.
So.. who is this Ratzinger the Vatican prelates hired to do their dirty work?
At a press conference after the document Dominus Iesus was released, Ratzinger stated and I quote…
“[W]e are in agreement that a Jew, and this is true for believers of other religions, does not need to know or acknowledge Christ as the Son of God in order to be saved, ..” -Zenit news story, “Are Believers of Other Religions Saved?”, Sept. 5, 2000
My Bible says..
·         Acts 2:21, "And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved."
·         Romans 10:13, "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."
So.. I ask, why would he say such a thing? It’s like I said before in a few Newsletters, my webpage entitled Pope declares Jesus not needed, and a couple Radio broadcasts. They need to water Jesus down dramatically and uplift MARY if they want to ensure a global takeover of all churches regardless if they are Christian or not. Rome MUST become the global moral authority if this is going to work. This is why many religions INCLUDING Muslims look to Mary as one worthy of respect and worship. They have been planning this from day one. In fact, Mary is mentioned 34 times in the Muslim Koran!
Back in May of 2003 the Vatican stated…
Islam Sees Mary as a Model for All Believers
Mentioned 34 Times in the Koran, Observes Archbishop Gioia
ROME, MAY 29, 2003 (Zenit.org).- Mary has a place in Islam too, says a Vatican aide.

"God is the only point of reference for the Muslim believer, but next to him are those who reflect his holiness. Mary is one of them," Archbishop Francesco Gioia, president of the Pilgrimages to the See of Peter. The archbishop expounds on that point in a book, "Mary, Mother of the Word, Model of Dialogue Between Religions," published by Città Nuova. "Mary occupies an outstanding place in Islam," he said. "She is the only woman whose name the Koran mentions -- up to 34 times."

Mary is particularly fascinating to Muslims. "She is the model of all believers because of her absolute faith and perfect 'submission' to the will of God," he added. "Vatican Council II took note of the benevolent attitude of the Muslims toward Mary, and in the declaration 'Nostra Aetate' one reads: 'They honor Mary, the virginal mother (of Jesus), and at times invoke her with devotion," the archbishop observed. Muslim faithful's affection and devotion for Mary is reflected in the pilgrimages they undertake to Marian shrines, especially Fatima, and in the fact that many Muslim women are called Mary, he added.  … "In the Koran, Mary has a decided Christological function, underlined by the prevailing designation of Jesus as 'son of Mary,'".
That’s right! The Vatican stated Mary had a CHRISTOLOGICAL FUNCTION with the Muslim! This is why Mary was mentioned in the very first statement of Ratzinger as Pope Benedict XVI on April 19, 2005...
Dear Brothers and Sisters:
After the great Pope, John Paul II, the Lord Cardinals have elected me, a simple, humble worker in the Lord's vineyourd. I am consoled by the fact that the Lord is able to work and act with insufficient instruments and, above all, I rely on your prayers. In the joy of the risen Lord, confident of his permanent help, let us go forward. The Lord will help us. Mary, his Most Holy Mother, is on our side. Thank you. -NBC News 4/19/2005
That’s right, after the usual comments, this new Pope declares his faith in MARY. So I guess it’s going to be business as usual. The Queen of Heaven is still the main god in Rome because of her political clout. Plus, the Babylonian trademark of confusion is so apparent in his statement here. One second he says the Lord will help them, and then he alludes as to how, by saying Mary is on his side.
This new pope has also said he sees nothing wrong with those that attend mass only once a year. Now as many of you know, I am not one to sanction the blasphemy of the Catholic mass. It’s something that should never be experienced at all! But THEY the Catholics think it’s their church service. Yet their new pope said..
“I have nothing against people who, though they never enter a church during the year, go to Christmas Mass, or go on the occasion of some other celebration, because this is also a way of coming close to the light.  Therefore, there must be different forms of involvement and participation.” -Zenit news interview, Oct. 1, 2001
The Catholics are also known for worshipping the small round piece of bread they call Jesus Christ incarnate. Yet this new pope of theirs said…
 “Eucharistic devotion such as is noted in the silent visit by the devout in church must not be thought of as a conversation with God.  This would assume that God was present there locally and in a confined way.  To justify such an assertion shows a lack of understanding of the Christological mysteries of the very concept of God.  This is repugnant to the serious thinking of the man who knows about the omnipresence of God.  To go to church on the ground that one can visit God who is present there is a senseless act which modern man rightfully rejects.” - Taken from Ratzinger’s work Die Sacramentale Begrundung:
You know what this means? Cardinal Ratzinger is NOT a Catholic. We already know he’s no Christian, but here we see he doesn’t even embrace the Catholic demonic doctrine of Transubstantiation. Which in laymen’s terms means, the priests thinks he does some strange magic to pull Jesus Christ off his throne, even if the priest is a practicing child rapist; Jesus must listen to his priest, and then the priest supposedly places Jesus’ soul inside the little round wafer for the catholic to eat. Now, those of us that understand Biblical doctrine, we all know this to be a lie. However, it seems even the new Pope agrees with us. Confused? Sure you are, this is ROME we’re dealing with here. They didn’t elect Ratzinger to run the Catholic church people. They have plenty of Cardinals and Bishops already doing that. He was politically placed to run the WORLD! For more in depth information on the Roman Catholic doctrine of Transubstantiation. See my “Transubstantiation exposed” page in the “RCC Doctrines” section of the web site.
Ratzinger also preaches that when people die, they resurrect as merely a person without a physical body…
 “Paul [St. Paul] teaches not the resurrection of physical bodies but of persons…” -Introduction to Christianity, San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1990, p. 277
As we all know, in Luke chapter 24 Jesus appeared before the apostles after His resurrection. Of course they were frightened thinking He was a ghost, so Jesus BLUNTLY calmed them with these words…
  • Luke 24:38-40, "And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?  Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.  And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet."
Later it speaks of Jesus eating fish and a piece of honeycomb to further prove He was in a flesh and bone body when He appeared. Then we see in Philippians this statement regarding the end result of OUR bodies if in fact we gain Heaven…
  • It says in Philippians 3:21 that, "Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself."
We will have the same body as Jesus! One would think a POPE would know such things. Well, that’s if you think Pope’s are supposed to be Christian leaders. Strange thing is, all Pope’s preach things that even a babe in Christ can see as blunt and easy to define error. Ratzinger is no Christian, He isn’t even a good Catholic for that matter. The reason Catholics can’t see this is because their leaders shun Bible reading worldwide, and most Catholics have no idea of what their own church teaches. I know, I have been dealing with Catholics for over 20 years now. In my circle of friends, this is common knowledge.
In the Dominus Iesus of Ratzinger in 2000 he stated the following.
"Therefore, the Church of Christ is present and operative also in these Churches, even though they lack full communion with the Catholic Church since they do not accept the Catholic doctrine of the Primacy, which, according to the will of God, the Bishop of Rome objectively has and exercises over the entire Church." - Dominus Iesus #1. Aug. 6, 2000
According to Catholic dogma, a statement like this would be considered heresy. In fact, their own pope Pius IX said back in 1862 the following…
 “There are other, almost countless, proofs drawn from the most trustworthy witnesses which clearly and openly testify with great faith, exactitude, respect and obedience that all who want to belong to the true and only Church of Christ must honor and obey this Apostolic See and the Roman Pontiff.” - Pope Pius IX, Amantissimus (# 3), April 8, 1862
And another Pope Pius, but this one is number VI said…
 “Finally, in one word, stay close to Us.  For no one can be in the Church of Christ without being in unity with its visible head and founded on the See of Peter.” - Pope Pius VI, Charitas (# 32), April 13, 1791
So.. one minute the popes say you must be Catholic and embrace the Pope as infallible in order to be in Christ’s church, the other then says the exact opposite? Truth is there are MANY statements of popes that go against what other popes have said already. So, confusion is the norm for this church. Still…I thought they said these men were infallible?
According to the already proven unbiblical Catholic doctrines, Ratzinger is what some Catholics would call an antipope, or a heretic. So, will they go forward with making his election null and void as their church proclaims is their duty? Or will they show the rules don’t matter when certain political movements are necessary.
"Of course, the election of a heretic, schismatic, or female [as Pope] would be null and void." - The Catholic Encyclopedia, “Papal Elections,” 1914, Vol. 11, p. 456:
By the way.. they never cast out Pope Joan did they? They not only let her stay in office, they changed her name to Pope Zacharias to try and hide the truth she was a female. The general public didn’t know she was a woman until she literally DIED in child birth during a public procession. (click here for details)
One drawback to the conclave is, they don’t quite know what’s happening on the outside world while locked in there. During the Papal Vacancy the law offices of Easton and Levy were able to push forward a few lawsuits that were being stonewalled due to John Paul II’s popularity. These lawyers send me breaking news on a regular basis because they know I’ll post it online. This last bunch of news was so shocking I immediately placed it on my URGENT BREAKING NEWS page on the site. I also have a list of past articles on my “VATICAN WAR CRIMES” page in the “CURRENT” section of the site. Ratzinger most assuredly has his work cut out for him.
For Immediate Release
April 18, 2005
Jonathan Levy and Tom Easton
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Alperin v. Vatican Bank
202-318-2406
resistk@youhoo.com
An Especially Bad Day for the Vatican Bank
 San Francisco:
While the world breathlessly awaits the election of the next Pope, the Vatican’s financial arm, the scandal-plagued Vatican Bank was dealt two blows today by American and Italian courts.
Alperin vs. Vatican Bank
 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled today that a Second World War restitution lawsuit filed in 1999 against the Vatican Bank and Franciscan Order could proceed.  The lawsuit restitution for Serbs, Jews, and former Soviet citizens for looting of property by the Nazi allied Croatian government during World War II.  The court ruled that claims for conversion of property laundered after the end of the war by the Vatican Bank and Franciscans could proceed.  The Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Sodano, perhaps sensing the case was going poorly had recently requested US Secretary of State Rice intervene on the Vatican’s behalf however the US State Department has chosen to abstain.  The amount at issue could exceed $100 million dollars; a copy of the Ninth Circuit decision is available here. PDF
 Murder of Roberto Calvi
In another unresolved Vatican Bank scandal, Italian authorities announced today that four people have been indicted on murder charges in the death of Italian financier Roberto Calvi, a banker with close ties to the Vatican who was found hanging under a bridge in London in 1982, according to CNN.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs in the Alperin vs. Vatican Bank case include Pepperdine University law professor, Lee Boyd, and Jonathan Levy and Tom Easton.  According to Tom Easton, the Vatican must own up to its past conduct as soon as possible, “an apology is long overdue.”  Jonathan Levy who is also familiar with the Calvi case stated: “The Vatican Bank has for too long clung to the coat tails of a popular Pope (the late John Paul II) with the election of a new Pope, this may soon change, and these longstanding claims seeking justice may finally be resolved.”
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/04/18/italy.murder.ap/ 
For more information:
www.vaticanbankclaims.com
Jonathan Levy, Esq.
202-318-2406
resistk@youhoo.com
9th Circuit OKs Suit Against Vatican Over Holocaust
Jeff Chorney
The Recorder
04-19-2005
  http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1113827719517
Just in time for the picking of a new pope, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided Monday that Holocaust survivors can pursue the Vatican Bank for profiting from a Nazi puppet regime.
Profiting from the Nazi regime means plainly that the Vatican was aware, as well as HELPING Hitler gain power. Hitler was Roman Catholic, and in obvious communications with the Vatican. There are many pictures of the prelates as well as the pope meeting with Hitler as well as saluting him! Keep in mind, the wound of the Vatican was just starting to heal thanks to the signing of the Lateran treaty back in 1929 when Mussolini and Cardinal Gasparri signed the necessary papers to bring the church & state entity of the Vatican back into existence after Napoleon knocked them out just as prophecy predicted! So, the Vatican needed a man like Hitler to pack the Vatican coffers to the hilt, and at the same time help in killing millions of Christians and Jews. Many people seem to forget that all the money and valuables of the slaughtered Jews didn’t get buried with Hitler. It had to end up somewhere. Well, now we know where!
Make special note to read the article entitled, “They’re all together” on the “Vatican War Crimes” page. It speaks in gruesome details about the Vatican’s involvement in the killings. Make special note about the contest the Nazi’s had to see who could kill the most people without bullets. They were trying to figure out an inexpensive method of killing because they needed the bullets for the war effort. A Roman Catholic priest won the contest one night by killing 1500 men woman and children. Of course they later decided on using Cyanide because Karol Wojtyla (Pronounced ~ Voy-tee-wah) who later became John Paul II could get it to them at a good price. From what I understand, his parents manufactured it as well.
Be prepared for a WINDFALL of dirty laundry in the coming weeks or months folks! You thought the child molestation scandal was bad. Wait till ALL the facts on the TRUE Vatican interests come to light in these lawsuits! Not even Mel Gibson and his "Catholic commercials" will be able to spin this mess out of existence! Perhaps now more and more Catholics will finally realize what the REAL meaning of the word "PROTESTANT" is!?
By the way, do you recall my April 10th Truth Provided broadcast of two weeks ago about the false Catholic prophet that supposedly predicted the names of Popes? Well, they did just as I predicted they would do. Am I a prophet, of course not. Are the lying prelates in Rome predicable? Need I ask that question? They KNOW in advance what Malachy’s so called prophecy predicts, so Ratzinger simply decided to pick a name that has to do with olives. Because Malachy supposedly used the term “Gloria Olivae” to predict the next Pope. It’s that simple. But the people that don’t want to see the truth will simply ignore a brightly lit fact like this.
Notice this article that came out the same day Ratzinger was elected. By the way, the timing is so obvious! You would think they would wait a few days eh?
ELECTION OF A PONTIFF
Pope choice fulfills ancient prophecy?
Saint wrote of 'Glory of the Olive,' which relates to Benedictine Order
Posted: April 19, 2005
7:30 p.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A prophecy by a 12th-century Catholic saint that predicted characteristics of the last 112 popes appears to have been strengthened by the election of the new pontiff today.
The prophecy labels the new pope "the Glory of the Olive." The Benedictine Order is known as the Olivetans and has as its symbol the olive branch. The new pope, though not of that order, chose as his name Benedict XVI.
The Vatican couldn't find a man that was of the Benedictine Order, so Ratzinger, KNOWING about the false prophet Malachy decides to use the name Benedict so as to make it appear his election proves the prophecy authentic! He is not, nor ever was associated with olives in any way shape or form! Yet they say the NAME he chose is? Is that absurd or what? What's worse, most Catholics will take this as a prophetic fulfillment ONLY because their prelates said so! Because there is no other method for verification! Pray for them! They are so deceived by these men. Sad thing is, many of the prelates of Rome know in advance they are lying. But the loyal and trusting Catholic doesn't. They just trust their leaders not to lie to them. This is how Satan is able to get them so easily. These priests wear , "...sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves."- Matthew 7:15
For more info on this Vatican compilation of lies, go to my John Paul II page in the RCC Exposed section of the web site and read or listen to my comments on that page. It’s largely a transcript of the April 10th Truth Provided Broadcast. I expose the easy to find truth about their so called prophet. This one is even easier then Nostradamus to expose.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)